A. The chief judge of each division shall be elected annually by the members of the division. The chief judge may be a member of any department of the division. The chief judge shall serve in such capacity until his successor has been elected as provided by this section.
B. The chief judge shall exercise administrative supervision over the division in which he serves, shall have such other duties as may be provided by rules of the supreme court and shall apportion the business to the departments in such manner as to equalize the distribution of business among them.
C. The chief judge may, and upon direction by the chief justice of the supreme court shall, designate one department to hear and determine all reviews authorized by the provisions of section 23-951. Such designated department may also hear and determine other matters assigned to it by the chief judge.
D. In the absence of the chief judge from the place at which the court is held, or his inability to act, the other judges shall select one of their own number to perform the duties and exercise the powers of the chief judge during such absence or inability to act.
E. The judges of each department shall periodically select a presiding judge and a member to act as the presiding judge to perform the duties and exercise the powers of the presiding judge during the absence or inability to act of the presiding judge.
F. The chief judge of division 2 shall be eligible to be the presiding judge of a department.
G. The chief judge of division 1 shall designate one department to hear and determine all appeals authorized by section 12-170. This department may also hear and determine other matters assigned to it by the chief judge.
Notes of Decisions
Rec. Centers of Sun City, Inc. v. Maricopa Cnty., 782 P.2d 1174 (Ariz. 1989).
· cites it 4× “Webb built various recreational facilities as part of the development. The record indicates that Webb had a consistent policy of conveying the recreation property to the homeowners' organization as phases of the development were completed.”
People of Faith, Inc. v. Arizona Dep't of Revenue, 791 P.2d 369 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 6× “The appeal shall be heard by a department of division 1 of the court of appeals designated hy the chief judge of the division pursuant to § 12-120.04. We do not interpret § 12-170(C) as granting a substantive right to appeal every ruling made by the tax court.”
Est. of Bohn v. Waddell, 848 P.2d 324 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 2× “Both appeals were assigned to Department T of this court pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 12-120.04 and 12-170(C). 4 . 4 U.”
Hibbs v. Calcot, Ltd., 801 P.2d 445 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 2× “The Chief Judge of Division One has assigned this appeal to Department T as permitted by A.R.S. § 12-120.04(G). HORIZONTAL APPEALS We first comment with disfavor on the practice followed in the trial court in this case.”
State v. Nilsen, 657 P.2d 419 (Ariz. 1983).
· cites it 2× “We take jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.04 and 17 A.R.S. Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 31.”
State Ex Rel. Arizona Dep't of Revenue v. Dillon, 826 P.2d 1186 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 2× “§ 12-2101(B); the appeal was assigned to Department T of this court pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 12-120.04 and 12-170(C). TIMELINESS OF THE DEPARTMENT’S ACTION UNDER A.”
Bromley Grp., Ltd. v. Arizona Dep't of Revenue, 826 P.2d 1158 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 2× “The matter is assigned to Department T of this court pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 12-120.04 and 12-170(C). *536 APPLICABILITY OF “NOMINAL PARTY” EXCEPTION IN THIS CASE The Department urges that it was a “nominal party” in this case within the meaning of A.”
Devenir Assocs. v. City of Phoenix, 821 P.2d 161 (Ariz. 1991).
“The judgment is final unless within thirty days after the entry of the judgment a notice of appeal is filed with the clerk of the tax court.”
Hohokam Resources v. Maricopa Cnty., 821 P.2d 257 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 2× “The appeal is assigned to Department T of this court pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 12-120.04(G) and 12-170(C). . For the tax years involved in this litigation, A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-120.04(G) — 9 cases
People of Faith, Inc. v. Arizona Dep't of Revenue, 791 P.2d 369 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
“The appeal shall be heard by a department of division 1 of the court of appeals designated hy the chief judge of the division pursuant to § 12-120.04. We do not interpret § 12-170(C) as granting a substantive right to appeal every ruling made by the tax court.”
Hibbs v. Calcot, Ltd., 801 P.2d 445 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
“The Chief Judge of Division One has assigned this appeal to Department T as permitted by A.R.S. § 12-120.04(G). HORIZONTAL APPEALS We first comment with disfavor on the practice followed in the trial court in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.