Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1284 (2026)
Notice of redemption by subsequent lienholder
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
To entitle a subsequent lienholder to redeem he shall, within the applicable period of redemption as provided in section 12-1282, file with the county recorder of the county in which the sale is made a notice in writing stating that he intends to redeem and specifying his lien and the amount thereof and its order of priority, and shall deliver a copy thereof to the sheriff of the county.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1967–2016 · leading case: Matcha v. Wachs, 646 P.2d 263 (Ariz. 1982).
Matcha v. Wachs, 646 P.2d 263 (Ariz. 1982). “He served a copy of the notice of intent to redeem on the sheriff as required by A.R.S. § 12-1284, [1] but failed to serve with it the documents required by A.”
Matcha v. Wachs, 646 P.2d 287 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). “Prior to the expiration of the six-months’ redemption period, on July 11, 1978, Wachs recorded and filed with the county recorder a Notice of Intent to Redeem pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1284. In addition, a copy of the Notice of Intent to Redeem was delivered to the Maricopa County…”
S & M Trust Co. v. Valley Lumber Co., 427 P.2d 354 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967). “” “§ 12-1284. Notice of redemption by subsequent lienholder “To entitle a subsequent lienholder to redeem he shall, within the applicable period of redemption as provided in § 12-1282, file with the county recorder of the county in which the sale is made a notice in writing…”
Dupnik v. United States, 848 F.2d 1476 (9th Cir. 1988). “See Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 12-1284 (1982). 1 It is undisputed that the applicable federal statute, 28 U.”
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. Arizona HOA Acceptance LLC, 369 P.3d 259 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “See generally A.R.S. § 12-1284 (2003) (“subsequent lien-holder” who wishes to redeem shall “file” with county recorder notice stating he intends to redeem).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.