Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 12
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1514 (2026)

Judgment or decree on award

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Upon the granting of an order confirming, modifying or correcting an award, judgment or decree shall be entered in confirmity therewith and be enforced as any other judgment or decree. Costs of the application and of the proceedings subsequent thereto, and disbursements may be awarded by the court.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1975–2024 · leading case: Steer Ex Rel. K & K Cable, Inc. v. Eggleston, 47 P.3d 1161 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Steer Ex Rel. K & K Cable, Inc. v. Eggleston, 47 P.3d 1161 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 9× “A.R.S. § 12-1514 (1994). A distribution of fees under the common fund doctrine can be made even after judgment is entered.”
Smith v. Pinnamaneni, 254 P.3d 409 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 6× “3d at 430 (analogizing to defendant who questions personal jurisdiction, does not appear, and plaintiff obtains default judgment; if court later finds personal jurisdiction, defendant must abide by default judgment).”
Nolan v. Kenner, 250 P.3d 236 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 12-1514 provides that “[c]osts of the application [for confirmation of an arbitration award] and of the proceedings subsequent thereto .”
Morgan v. Carillon Investments, Inc., 88 P.3d 1159 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “¶ 28 Plaintiffs seek an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1514 (2003). However, Plaintiffs are not entitled to recover fees under § 12-1514 because, by its own terms, it only applies “[u]pon the granting of an order confirming, modifying or correcting an award.”
Canon Sch. Dist. No. 50 v. W.E.S. Constr. Co., 868 P.2d 1014 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 7× “See A.R.S. § 12-1514 (1989). We conclude that the term “action,” as used in A.”
Brake Masters Sys., Inc. v. Gabbay, 78 P.3d 1081 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “¶ 22 Brake Masters has requested attorney fees on appeal under A.R.S. §§ 12-1514 and 12-341.01 and also pursuant to 15 U.”
Canon Sch. Dist. No. 50 v. W.E.S. Constr. Co., 882 P.2d 1274 (Ariz. 1994). · cites it 9× “§ 12-1510 expressly excludes attorney’s fees from the arbitration award absent an express provision in the arbitration agreement, whereas the confirmation statute, AR.S. § 12-1514, does not mention attorney’s fees.”
Atreus Communities Grp. v. Stardust Dev., Inc., 277 P.3d 208 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “Despite imposing the burden of proof on the party responding to the application for confirmation, the legislature made no provision for that party to “have the last word.” We therefore find no error in the trial court’s denial of Atreus’s request to submit a supplemental brief.”
Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel Congregation, 720 A.2d 912 (Md. 1998). · cites it 2× “Then noting that approach had prompted most jurisdictions interpreting the language in its A.R.S. § 12-1514, the Arizona equivalent to § 3-228, 12 to permit the award of attorneys’ fees in confirmation proceedings, the court concluded: “The interpretations of our sister states…”
EFC Dev. Corp. v. F. F. Baugh Plumbing & Heating Inc., 540 P.2d 185 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 4× “This motion erroneously referred to A.R.S. § 12-1514 rather than § 12-1511, was not served upon appellant “in the same manner in which complaints are .”
Creative Builders, Inc. v. Avenue Developments, Inc., 715 P.2d 308 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 12-1514. Although the parties differed as to the appropriate language to be included in the judgment confirming the award, neither party suggested in its motion or included in its proposed form of judgment any provision for the awarding of any interest, pre-award or…”
Cho v. Am. Bonding Co., 951 P.2d 468 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “Attorneys’ Fees Request The Chos request an award of attorneys’ fees incurred in this appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1514. This statute allows the court to award costs and disbursements incurred in seeking the confirmation, modification, or correction of an arbitration award,…”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.