Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 12
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1837 (2026)

Review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All orders, judgments and decrees under this article may be reviewed as other orders, judgments and decrees.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2021 · leading case: State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Bogart, 717 P.2d 449 (Ariz. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Bogart, 717 P.2d 449 (Ariz. 1986). · cites it 2× “6, § 5(3), A.R.S. §§ 12-1837 and 12-120.24. FACTS On October 2, 1978, John May (May) rented an automobile from a Maricopa County office of the Hertz Corporation (Hertz).”
Kondaur Capital Corp. v. Pinal Cnty., 330 P.3d 379 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Although we generally have jurisdiction to review declaratory judgments pursuant to AR.S. §§ 12-1837 and 12-2101(A)(1), we decline to do so here for reasons set forth below.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Fireman's Fund Ins., 717 P.2d 858 (Ariz. 1986). · cites it 2× “6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. §§ 12-1837 and 12-120.24. FACTS In March of 1983 Deanne Sasselli (Sassel-li) owned two vehicles, both of which were insured under separate policies issued by State Farm.”
Beck v. Deem, 224 P.3d 938 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 12-1837 (2003) and 12-2101(B), (J) (2003).”
In Re Est. of Olson, 224 P.3d 938 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “§ 33-420 (2007). The court also declared that Landmarc had an equitable lien against the property in the amount of $76,786.”
Burns v. Apsc (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “The court granted the motions, concluding that Burns “lack[ed] standing to assert the due process rights of litigants to an unbiased adjudicative process” and “no other constitutional or statutory authority entitle[d] him to initiate and maintain an investigation into potential…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.