Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2238

Mediation; privileged communications; exceptions; liability; definitions

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Before or after the filing of a complaint, mediation may occur pursuant to law, a court order or a voluntary decision of the parties.

B. The mediation process is confidential. Communications made, materials created for or used and acts occurring during a mediation are confidential and may not be discovered or admitted into evidence unless one of the following exceptions is met:

1. All of the parties to the mediation agree to the disclosure.

2. The communication, material or act is relevant to a claim or defense made by a party to the mediation against the mediator or the mediation program arising out of a breach of a legal obligation owed by the mediator to the party.

3. The disclosure is required by statute.

4. The disclosure is necessary to enforce an agreement to mediate.

5. The disclosure is made in a report to a law enforcement officer, the department of child safety or adult protective services by a court appointed mediator who reasonably believes that a minor or vulnerable adult is or has been a victim of abuse, child abuse, neglect, exploitation, physical injury or a reportable offense.

C. Except pursuant to subsection B, paragraph 2, 3, 4 or 5 of this section, a mediator is not subject to service of process or a subpoena to produce evidence or to testify regarding any evidence or occurrence relating to the mediation proceedings.  Evidence that exists independently of the mediation even if the evidence is used in connection with the mediation is subject to service of process or subpoena.

D. Notwithstanding subsection B of this section, when necessary to enforce or obtain approval of an agreement that is reached by the parties in a mediation, the terms of an agreement that is evidenced by a record that is signed by the parties are not confidential. The agreement may be introduced in any proceeding to obtain court approval of the agreement, where required by law, or to enforce the agreement.  If a party requests that all or a portion of the agreement remain confidential, the agreement may be disclosed to the court under seal with a request to issue appropriate orders to protect the confidentiality of the agreement, as permitted by law.

E. Notwithstanding subsection B of this section, threatened or actual violence that occurs during a mediation is not a privileged communication. The mediator may inform the parties that threatened or actual violence is not privileged and may be disclosed.

F. A mediator is not subject to civil liability except for those acts or omissions that involve intentional misconduct or reckless disregard of a substantial risk of a significant injury to the rights of others.

G. For the purposes of this section:

1. "Abuse" has the same meaning prescribed in section 8-201 if the victim is a minor or section 46-451 if the victim is a vulnerable adult.

2. "Child abuse" means child abuse pursuant to section 13-3623.

3. "Exploitation" has the same meaning prescribed in section 46-451.

4. "Mediation" means a process in which parties who are involved in a dispute enter into one or more private settlement discussions outside of a formal court proceeding with a neutral third party to try to resolve the dispute.

5. "Neglect" has the same meaning prescribed in section 8-201 if the victim is a minor or section 46-451 if the victim is a vulnerable adult.

6. "Physical injury" has the same meaning prescribed in section 13-105.

7. "Record" means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and that is retrievable in a perceivable form.

8. "Reportable offense" has the same meaning prescribed in section 13-3620.

9. "Sign" means to execute or adopt a tangible symbol with the present intent to authenticate a record or to attach or logically associate an electronic symbol, sound or process to or with a record with the present intent to authenticate a record.

10. "Vulnerable adult" has the same meaning prescribed in section 13-3623.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Grubaugh v. Hon blomo/lawrence
Grubaugh v. Hon blomo/lawrence (2015) arizctapp · cites it 31× “Arizona’s Rules of Family Law Procedure emphasize that “all communications” in the context of the mediation are confidential and § 12-2238 is applicable: “Mediation conferences shall be held in private, and all communications, verbal or written, shall be confidential____ Unless…”
Donahoe v. Arpaio (2012) azd · cites it 16× “THE MEDIATION PRIVILEGE OF A.R.S. § 12-2238 DOES NOT PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OR ENFORCEMENT OF A WRITTEN OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE INTENDED TO BE BINDING, EVEN IF CONVEYED THROUGH A PERSON WHO ALSO SERVED AS A MEDIATOR The County objected to Smith’s testimony that he authorized Skelly to…”
Mary Wilcox v. County of Maricopa (2014) ca9 · cites it 2× “Arizona’s mediation privilege statute, Ariz. Rev.Stat. § 12-2238, protects "[c]ommunica-tions made .”
Fair v. Bakhtiari (2006) cal · cites it 2× “, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2238 (B)(4); Conn.”
Miller v. Kelly (2006) arizctapp · cites it 4× “They also maintain that the information is privileged and confidential, relying on language in the settlement agreements, A.R.S. § 12-2238, and Rule 408, Ariz. R. Evid.”
Ulibarri v. SUPERIOR CT. CTY. OF COCONINO (1995) arizctapp · cites it 2× “; see Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 12-2238, 12-2235, 32-749, 32-2085.”
Deebes v. Deebes (2025) arizctapp · cites it 16× “3 provides that A.R.S. § 12-2238’s confidentiality provisions apply to family-law mediations.”
FRED MILLER M.D., Et Ux. v. LUZ BARRERA, MUTUAL INSURANCE CO (2006) arizctapp · cites it 4× “They also maintain that the information is privileged and confidential, relying on language in the settlement agreements, A.R.S. § 12-2238, and Rule 408, Ariz. R. Evid.”
McGill v. Ball (2022) arizctapp · cites it 2× “Mediation, Black’s, supra; see also A.R.S. § 12-2238(G)(4) (defining mediation in the context of privileged communications); but see 1 Sarah R.”
Born-Betts v. Passage (2024) azd · cites it 2× “Defendant had argued that Arizona’s statutory mediation 28 privilege, A.R.S. § 12-2238, barred the use of this filing—so it could not remove until 1 September 15, 2023—when Plaintiff filed her Motion for Leave to Amend her Complaint.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2238(B) — 3 cases
Grubaugh v. Hon blomo/lawrence (2015) arizctapp “Arizona’s Rules of Family Law Procedure emphasize that “all communications” in the context of the mediation are confidential and § 12-2238 is applicable: “Mediation conferences shall be held in private, and all communications, verbal or written, shall be confidential____ Unless…”
Donahoe v. Arpaio (2012) azd “THE MEDIATION PRIVILEGE OF A.R.S. § 12-2238 DOES NOT PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OR ENFORCEMENT OF A WRITTEN OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE INTENDED TO BE BINDING, EVEN IF CONVEYED THROUGH A PERSON WHO ALSO SERVED AS A MEDIATOR The County objected to Smith’s testimony that he authorized Skelly to…”
Deebes v. Deebes (2025) arizctapp “3 provides that A.R.S. § 12-2238’s confidentiality provisions apply to family-law mediations.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2238(B)(1) — 1 case
Grubaugh v. Hon blomo/lawrence (2015) arizctapp “Arizona’s Rules of Family Law Procedure emphasize that “all communications” in the context of the mediation are confidential and § 12-2238 is applicable: “Mediation conferences shall be held in private, and all communications, verbal or written, shall be confidential____ Unless…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2238(B)(4) — 2 cases
Fair v. Bakhtiari (2006) cal “, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2238 (B)(4); Conn.”
Deebes v. Deebes (2025) arizctapp “3 provides that A.R.S. § 12-2238’s confidentiality provisions apply to family-law mediations.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2238(D) — 1 case
Mary Wilcox v. County of Maricopa (2014) ca9 “Arizona’s mediation privilege statute, Ariz. Rev.Stat. § 12-2238, protects "[c]ommunica-tions made .”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2238(G)(1) — 1 case
Donahoe v. Arpaio (2012) azd “THE MEDIATION PRIVILEGE OF A.R.S. § 12-2238 DOES NOT PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OR ENFORCEMENT OF A WRITTEN OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE INTENDED TO BE BINDING, EVEN IF CONVEYED THROUGH A PERSON WHO ALSO SERVED AS A MEDIATOR The County objected to Smith’s testimony that he authorized Skelly to…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2238(G)(4) — 1 case
McGill v. Ball (2022) arizctapp “Mediation, Black’s, supra; see also A.R.S. § 12-2238(G)(4) (defining mediation in the context of privileged communications); but see 1 Sarah R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.