Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 12
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2455 (2026)

Recognition of emancipation from another jurisdiction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

12-2455. Recognition of emancipation from another jurisdiction

This state shall recognize a minor as an emancipated minor if that minor can document emancipation from another jurisdiction of the United States and is at least sixteen years of age.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1979–1994 · leading case: Lamb v. Superior Court, Etc., 621 P.2d 906 (Ariz. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lamb v. Superior Court, Etc., 621 P.2d 906 (Ariz. 1980). · cites it 4× “Here, the order on which the garnishment and subpoena duces tecum were based was the minute entry of December 5, 1979. Since there has been no formal order entered, the writ of garnishment and the subpoena duces tecum should not have issued and Judge Scott was without…”
Pflum v. Pflum, 660 P.2d 1231 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 5× “A.R.S. § 12-2455 appears to confirm the application of the above statute to the case before us.”
Polacke v. Superior Court, 823 P.2d 84 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 12-2455; see Pflum v. Pflum, 135 Ariz.”
Ibach v. Ibach, 600 P.2d 1370 (Ariz. 1979). · cites it 2× “Carruth, supra, was published, the Legislature, passed A.R.S. § 12-2455. It provides: “Any judgment, order or decree, whether arising from a dissolution, divorce, separation, annulment, custody determination, paternity or maternity determination or from Uniform Reciprocal…”
Steiner v. Steiner, 880 P.2d 1152 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “In this decision, we do not consider the effect of section 12-2455 because the appeal was not brought from a judgment pursuant to this statute and neither party raised this as an issue on appeal.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2455(A) — 2 cases
Polacke v. Superior Court, 823 P.2d 84 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). “A.R.S. § 12-2455; see Pflum v. Pflum, 135 Ariz.”
Steiner v. Steiner, 880 P.2d 1152 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). “In this decision, we do not consider the effect of section 12-2455 because the appeal was not brought from a judgment pursuant to this statute and neither party raised this as an issue on appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.