12-3008. Interim remedies
A. Before an arbitrator is appointed and is authorized and able to act, the court, on motion of a party to an arbitration proceeding and for good cause shown, may enter an order for interim remedies to protect the effectiveness of the arbitration proceeding to the same extent and under the same conditions as if the controversy were the subject of a civil action.
B. After an arbitrator is appointed and is authorized and able to act:
1. The arbitrator may issue such orders for interim remedies, including interim awards, as the arbitrator finds necessary to protect the effectiveness of the arbitration proceeding and to promote the fair and expeditious resolution of the controversy, to the same extent and under the same conditions as if the controversy were the subject of a civil action.
2. A party to an arbitration proceeding may move the court for an interim remedy only if the matter is urgent and the arbitrator is not able to act timely or the arbitrator cannot provide an adequate remedy.
C. A party does not waive a right of arbitration by making a motion under subsection A or B.
Notes of Decisions
Sun Valley Ranch 308 Ltd. P'ship v. Robson, 294 P.3d 125 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “Indeed, A.R.S. § 12-3008(B)(1) confers broad powers on arbitrators, authorizing them to: issue such orders for interim remedies, including interim awards, as the arbitrator finds necessary to protect the effectiveness of the arbitration proceeding and to promote the fair and…”
Phoenix-Tucson v. Deetz (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 12-3008(B)(1) (2016) (“The arbitrator may issue such orders for interim remedies, including interim awards, as the arbitrator finds necessary to protect the effectiveness of the arbitration proceeding and to promote the fair and expeditious resolution of the…”
Phoenix-Tucson v. Deetz (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 12-3008(B)(1) (2016) (“The arbitrator may issue such orders for interim remedies, including interim awards, as the arbitrator finds necessary to 9 PHOENIX-TUCSON v.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-3008(B)(1) — 3 cases
Sun Valley Ranch 308 Ltd. P'ship v. Robson, 294 P.3d 125 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
“Indeed, A.R.S. § 12-3008(B)(1) confers broad powers on arbitrators, authorizing them to: issue such orders for interim remedies, including interim awards, as the arbitrator finds necessary to protect the effectiveness of the arbitration proceeding and to promote the fair and…”
Phoenix-Tucson v. Deetz (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“See A.R.S. § 12-3008(B)(1) (2016) (“The arbitrator may issue such orders for interim remedies, including interim awards, as the arbitrator finds necessary to protect the effectiveness of the arbitration proceeding and to promote the fair and expeditious resolution of the…”
Phoenix-Tucson v. Deetz (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“See A.R.S. § 12-3008(B)(1) (2016) (“The arbitrator may issue such orders for interim remedies, including interim awards, as the arbitrator finds necessary to 9 PHOENIX-TUCSON v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.