Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-527 (2026)
Effect of limitation on title
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
When an action for recovery of real property is barred by any provision of this article, the person who pleads and is entitled to the bar shall be held to have full title precluding all claims.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1967–2025 · leading case: Quality Plastics, Inc. v. Moore, 640 P.2d 169 (Ariz. 1981).
Quality Plastics, Inc. v. Moore, 640 P.2d 169 (Ariz. 1981). “Because Quality did not bring its action within five years of the issuance of the Treasurer’s Deed to Kaiser, its quiet title action was barred, and the Moores are entitled to full title to the property pursuant to A.”
Dominguez v. Dominguez, 567 P.3d 81 (Ariz. 2025). “See A.R.S. § 12-527. ¶2 We decide that a “recorded deed” under § 12-524 includes any deed that is facially valid, including a forged deed.”
Overson v. Cowley, 664 P.2d 210 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982). “A.R.S. § 12-527; Villescas v. Arizona Copper Co.”
Berryhill v. Moore, 881 P.2d 1182 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). “The language of section 12-526(A) implies that only a person with a present right to recover land from an adverse possessor is required to begin an action to do so within the ten-year period to prevent his claim from being barred pursuant to A.”
Nicholas v. Giles, 426 P.2d 398 (Ariz. 1967). “Twenty-four days later, defendants filed their answer denying the foregoing allegations; but in the meantime and before the filing of the answer, the fifth year’s taxes had been paid.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.