Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-812 (2026)
Nuisance
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A. Any person who maintains, establishes or conducts a nuisance, or aids or abets therein, and the agent or lessee of any interest in any such nuisance together with the persons in control of any such nuisance by any such agent or lessee can be enjoined from maintaining a nuisance pursuant to this article.
B. Upon receiving notice pursuant to section 12-814, such persons are deemed to have knowledge of the nuisance and are liable for its maintenance.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1984–2013 · leading case: James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & Co., 295 P.3d 421 (Ariz. 2013).
James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & Co., 295 P.3d 421 (Ariz. 2013). “, A.R.S. § 12-812 (aiding and abetting liability for violating public nuisance obscenity statutes); id.”
State v. Book-Cellar, Inc., 679 P.2d 548 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). “§ 12-812. Nuisance A. Any person who maintains, establishes or conducts a nuisance, or aids or abets therein, and the agent or lessee of any interest in any such nuisance together with the persons in control of any such nuisance by any such agent or lessee can be enjoined from…”
Stephenson v. Nastro in & for Cnty. of Maricopa, 967 P.2d 616 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998). “219, § 45, an affidavit of acknowledgement of paternity acquired the force and effect of a superior court judgment, without the necessity of obtaining a court order pursuant to A.R.S § 12-812(B) (1996). 11 . The current limitations in A.”
State v. Book-Cellar, Inc., 679 P.2d 548 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). “§ 12-812. Nuisance A. Any person who maintains, establishes or conducts a nuisance, or aids or abets therein, and the agent or lessee of any interest in any such nuisance together with the persons in control of any such nuisance by any such agent or lessee can be enjoined from…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-812(B) — 1 case
Stephenson v. Nastro in & for Cnty. of Maricopa, 967 P.2d 616 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998). “219, § 45, an affidavit of acknowledgement of paternity acquired the force and effect of a superior court judgment, without the necessity of obtaining a court order pursuant to A.R.S § 12-812(B) (1996). 11 . The current limitations in A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.