Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 13
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

13-105. Definitions

In this title, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Absconder" means a probationer who has moved from the probationer's primary residence without permission of the probation officer, who cannot be located within ninety days of the previous contact and against whom a petition to revoke has been filed in the superior court alleging that the probationer's whereabouts are unknown.  A probationer is no longer deemed an absconder when the probationer is voluntarily or involuntarily returned to probation service.

2. "Act" means a bodily movement.

3. "Benefit" means anything of value or advantage, present or prospective.

4. "Calendar year" means three hundred sixty-five days' actual time served without release, suspension or commutation of sentence, probation, pardon or parole, work furlough or release from confinement on any other basis.

5. "Community supervision" means that portion of a felony sentence that is imposed by the court pursuant to section 13-603, subsection I and that is served in the community after completing a period of imprisonment or served in prison in accordance with section 41-1604.07.

6. "Conduct" means an act or omission and its accompanying culpable mental state.

7. "Crime" means a misdemeanor or a felony.

8. "Criminal street gang" means an ongoing formal or informal association of persons in which members or associates individually or collectively engage in the commission, attempted commission, facilitation or solicitation of any felony act and that has at least one individual who is a criminal street gang member.

9. "Criminal street gang member" means an individual to whom at least two of the following seven criteria that indicate criminal street gang membership apply:

(a) Self-proclamation.

(b) Witness testimony or official statement.

(c) Written or electronic correspondence.

(d) Paraphernalia or photographs.

(e) Tattoos.

(f) Clothing or colors.

(g) Any other indicia of street gang membership.

10. "Culpable mental state" means intentionally, knowingly, recklessly or with criminal negligence as those terms are defined in this paragraph:

(a) "Intentionally" or "with the intent to" means, with respect to a result or to conduct described by a statute defining an offense, that a person's objective is to cause that result or to engage in that conduct.

(b) "Knowingly" means, with respect to conduct or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense, that a person is aware or believes that the person's conduct is of that nature or that the circumstance exists. It does not require any knowledge of the unlawfulness of the act or omission.

(c) "Recklessly" means, with respect to a result or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense, that a person is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists. The risk must be of such nature and degree that disregard of such risk constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.  A person who creates such a risk but who is unaware of such risk solely by reason of voluntary intoxication also acts recklessly with respect to such risk.

(d) "Criminal negligence" means, with respect to a result or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense, that a person fails to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists. The risk must be of such nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.

11. "Dangerous drug" means dangerous drug as defined in section 13-3401.

12. "Dangerous instrument" means anything that under the circumstances in which it is used, attempted to be used or threatened to be used is readily capable of causing death or serious physical injury.

13. "Dangerous offense" means an offense involving the discharge, use or threatening exhibition of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument or the intentional or knowing infliction of serious physical injury on another person.

14. "Deadly physical force" means force that is used with the purpose of causing death or serious physical injury or in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of creating a substantial risk of causing death or serious physical injury.

15. "Deadly weapon" means anything designed for lethal use, including a firearm.

16. "Economic loss" means any loss incurred by a person as a result of the commission of an offense. Economic loss includes lost interest, lost earnings and other losses that would not have been incurred but for the offense. Economic loss does not include losses incurred by the convicted person, damages for pain and suffering, punitive damages or consequential damages.

17. "Enterprise" includes any corporation, association, labor union or other legal entity.

18. "Felony" means an offense for which a sentence to a term of imprisonment in the custody of the state department of corrections is authorized by any law of this state.

19. "Firearm" means any loaded or unloaded handgun, pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun or other weapon that will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of expanding gases, except that it does not include a firearm in permanently inoperable condition.

20. "Government" means the state, any political subdivision of the state or any department, agency, board, commission, institution or governmental instrumentality of or within the state or political subdivision.

21. "Governmental function" means any activity that a public servant is legally authorized to undertake on behalf of a government.

22. "Historical prior felony conviction" means:

(a) Any prior felony conviction for which the offense of conviction either:

(i) Mandated a term of imprisonment except for a violation of chapter 34 of this title involving a drug below the threshold amount.

(ii) Involved a dangerous offense.

(iii) Involved the illegal control of a criminal enterprise.

(iv) Involved aggravated driving or actual physical control while under the influence. This item applies only if the offense for which the historical prior felony conviction is being alleged is a violation of section 28-1383.

(v) Involved any dangerous crime against children as defined in section 13-705.

(b) Any class 2 or 3 felony, except the offenses listed in subdivision (a) of this paragraph, that was committed within the ten years immediately preceding the date of the present offense.  Any time spent on absconder status while on probation, on escape status or incarcerated is excluded in calculating if the offense was committed within the preceding ten years.  If a court determines a person was not on absconder status while on probation or escape status, that time is not excluded. For the purposes of this subdivision, "escape" means:

(i) A departure from custody or from a juvenile secure care facility, a juvenile detention facility or an adult correctional facility in which the person is held or detained, with knowledge that the departure is not allowed, or the failure to return to custody or detention following a temporary leave granted for a specific purpose or for a limited period.

(ii) A failure to report as ordered to custody or detention to begin serving a term of incarceration.

(c) Any class 4, 5 or 6 felony, except the offenses listed in subdivision (a), item (i), (ii), (iii) or (v) of this paragraph, that was committed within the five years immediately preceding the date of the present offense. Any time spent on absconder status while on probation, on escape status or incarcerated is excluded in calculating if the offense was committed within the preceding five years. If a court determines a person was not on absconder status while on probation or escape status, that time is not excluded. For the purposes of this subdivision, "escape" has the same meaning prescribed in subdivision (b) of this paragraph.

(d) Any felony conviction that is a third or more prior felony conviction. For the purposes of this subdivision, "prior felony conviction" includes any offense committed outside the jurisdiction of this state that was punishable by that jurisdiction as a felony.

(e) Any offense committed outside the jurisdiction of this state that was punishable by that jurisdiction as a felony and that was committed within the five years immediately preceding the date of the present offense.  Any time spent on absconder status while on probation, on escape status or incarcerated is excluded in calculating if the offense was committed within the preceding five years. If a court determines a person was not on absconder status while on probation or escape status, that time is not excluded. For the purposes of this subdivision, "escape" has the same meaning prescribed in subdivision (b) of this paragraph.

(f) Any offense committed outside the jurisdiction of this state that involved the discharge, use or threatening exhibition of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument or the intentional or knowing infliction of death or serious physical injury and that was punishable by that jurisdiction as a felony. A person who has been convicted of a felony weapons possession violation in any court outside the jurisdiction of this state that would not be punishable as a felony under the laws of this state is not subject to this paragraph.

23. "Human smuggling organization" means an ongoing formal or informal association of persons in which members or associates individually or collectively engage in the smuggling of human beings.

24. "Intoxication" means any mental or physical incapacity resulting from use of drugs, toxic vapors or intoxicating liquors.

25. "Misdemeanor" means an offense for which a sentence to a term of imprisonment other than to the custody of the state department of corrections is authorized by any law of this state.

26. "Narcotic drug" means narcotic drugs as defined in section 13-3401.

27. "Offense" or "public offense" means conduct for which a sentence to a term of imprisonment or of a fine is provided by any law of the state in which it occurred or by any law, regulation or ordinance of a political subdivision of that state and, if the act occurred in a state other than this state, it would be so punishable under the laws, regulations or ordinances of this state or of a political subdivision of this state if the act had occurred in this state.

28. "Omission" means the failure to perform an act as to which a duty of performance is imposed by law.

29. "Peace officer" means any person vested by law with a duty to maintain public order and make arrests and includes a constable.

30. "Person" means a human being and, as the context requires, an enterprise, a public or private corporation, an unincorporated association, a partnership, a firm, a society, a government, a governmental authority or an individual or entity capable of holding a legal or beneficial interest in property.

31. "Petty offense" means an offense for which a sentence of a fine only is authorized by law.

32. "Physical force" means force used upon or directed toward the body of another person and includes confinement, but does not include deadly physical force.

33. "Physical injury" means the impairment of physical condition.

34. "Possess" means knowingly to have physical possession or otherwise to exercise dominion or control over property.

35. "Possession" means a voluntary act if the defendant knowingly exercised dominion or control over property.

36. "Preconviction custody" means the confinement of a person in a jail in this state or another state after the person is arrested for or charged with a felony offense.

37. "Property" means anything of value, tangible or intangible.

38. "Public servant":

(a) Means any officer or employee of any branch of government, whether elected, appointed or otherwise employed, including a peace officer, and any person participating as an advisor or consultant or otherwise in performing a governmental function.

(b) Does not include jurors or witnesses.

(c) Includes those who have been elected, appointed, employed or designated to become a public servant although not yet occupying that position.

39. "Serious physical injury" includes physical injury that creates a reasonable risk of death, or that causes serious and permanent disfigurement, serious impairment of health or loss or protracted impairment of the function of any bodily organ or limb.

40. "Unlawful" means contrary to law or, where the context so requires, not allowed by law.

41. "Vehicle" means a device in, upon or by which any person or property is, may be or could have been transported or drawn upon a highway, waterway or airway, excepting devices moved by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks.

42. "Voluntary act" means a bodily movement performed consciously and as a result of effort and determination.

43. "Voluntary intoxication" means intoxication caused by the knowing use of drugs, toxic vapors or intoxicating liquors by a person, the tendency of which to cause intoxication the person knows or ought to know, unless the person introduces them pursuant to medical advice or under such duress as would afford a defense to an offense.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 736 cases (144 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle, 379 P.3d 197 (Ariz. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle, 379 P.3d 197 (Ariz. 2016). · cites it 20× “¶17 The plain text of §§ 13-1404(A) and 13-1410(A) defines all the elements of sexual abuse and child molestation.”
In Re Andrew C., 160 P.3d 687 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 24× “[2] Subsection 14 of A.R.S. § 13-105, defining "economic loss," was added by Senate Bill 1232 of the 1986 legislative session.”
State v. Pena, 104 P.3d 873 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 8× “A "dangerous instrument" is "anything that under the circumstances in which it is used, attempted to be used or threatened to be used is readily capable of causing death or serious physical injury.”
State v. Johnson, 380 P.3d 99 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 23× “First, § 13-105 provides that its definitions are to control “unless the context otherwise requires.”
State v. Gallegos, 870 P.2d 1097 (Ariz. 1994). · cites it 10× “This argument implicitly relies on § 13-105(23), which defines a person as a "human being.”
Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 1121 (9th Cir. 2006). · cites it 5× “See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105 (9)(c) (defining recklessness as “consciously disre- gard[ing] a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists,” and providing that “[a] person who creates such a risk but is unaware of such risk…”
State v. Henry, 68 P.3d 455 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 8× “Rather, “benefit” is defined among the definitions for the entire criminal code in § 13-105 and includes “anything of value or advantage,” not merely pecuniary gain.”
State v. Thues, 54 P.3d 368 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 7× “” A.R.S. § 13-105(16) (2001). Thues seizes on this latter definition and argues that because the legislature did not authorize imprisonment for a first or second conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia, the offense is not a “felony” and, therefore, cannot be considered a…”
State v. Cox, 174 P.3d 265 (Ariz. 2007). · cites it 6× “¶ 11 The instruction given at trial defined possession using the terminology in A.R.S. § 13-105(30). The judge instructed the jury that “ ‘[pjossess’ means to knowingly exercise dominion or control over property.”
State v. George, 79 P.3d 1050 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 8× “We must therefore determine whether the state presented sufficient evidence from which reasonable jurors could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that the injury had seriously impaired her health or caused her to suffer a protracted impairment of the use of her arm.”
State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Larin, 310 P.3d 990 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 8× “” A.R.S. § 13-105(13). Section 13-704, AR.S.”
State v. Womack, 847 P.2d 609 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 12× “[3] A.R.S. § 13-105(6), defining culpable mental states, provides: (a) "Intentionally" or "with the intent to" means, with respect to a result or to conduct described by a statute defining an offense, that a person's objective is to cause that result or to engage in that conduct.”
Show all 736 citing cases →
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(1) — 4 cases
State v. Comer, 799 P.2d 333 (Ariz. 1990).
State v. Gordon, 778 P.2d 1204 (Ariz. 1989).
State v. Hamblin, 797 P.2d 1229 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
State v. Moran, 784 P.2d 730 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(10) — 13 cases
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle, 379 P.3d 197 (Ariz. 2016). “¶17 The plain text of §§ 13-1404(A) and 13-1410(A) defines all the elements of sexual abuse and child molestation.”
State of Arizona v. Eric Boyston, 298 P.3d 887 (Ariz. 2013).
State v. Valles, 780 P.2d 1049 (Ariz. 1989).
State v. Millis, 391 P.3d 1225 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Burke, 360 P.3d 118 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(10)(B) — 1 case
State v. Medina (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(10)(a) — 20 cases
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle, 379 P.3d 197 (Ariz. 2016). “¶17 The plain text of §§ 13-1404(A) and 13-1410(A) defines all the elements of sexual abuse and child molestation.”
State of Arizona v. Vincent Michael Allen, 326 P.3d 339 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State of Arizona v. Miguel Francisco Inzunza, 316 P.3d 1266 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Cagle, 266 P.3d 1070 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle (Ariz. 2016).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(10)(b) — 46 cases
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle, 379 P.3d 197 (Ariz. 2016). “¶17 The plain text of §§ 13-1404(A) and 13-1410(A) defines all the elements of sexual abuse and child molestation.”
State v. Speer, 212 P.3d 787 (Ariz. 2009).
State v. Francis, 388 P.3d 843 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Aguirre, 527 P.3d 894 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2023).
Benevolent & Prot. Order of Elks 2656 v. State Dep't of Liquor Licenses & Control, 366 P.3d 1011 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(10)(c) — 48 cases
State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde, 315 P.3d 1200 (Ariz. 2014).
State v. Speer, 212 P.3d 787 (Ariz. 2009).
State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer, 303 P.3d 84 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
State of Arizona v. George Anthony Dominguez Jr., 338 P.3d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Eddington, 244 P.3d 76 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(10)(d) — 10 cases
Bashir v. Pineda, 248 P.3d 199 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
United States v. Christopher Carlson, 533 F. App'x 743 (9th Cir. 2013).
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen, 513 P.3d 282 (Ariz. 2022).
State of Arizona v. Anthony Eugene Searight (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026).
State v. Espinoza (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(10)(e) — 1 case
State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer, 303 P.3d 84 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(11) — 28 cases
State v. Pena, 104 P.3d 873 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “A "dangerous instrument" is "anything that under the circumstances in which it is used, attempted to be used or threatened to be used is readily capable of causing death or serious physical injury.”
State v. Morris, 839 P.2d 434 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992).
State v. Wideman, 798 P.2d 1373 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
State v. Gatliff, 102 P.3d 981 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa Cnty. Juv. Action No. JV-128676, 868 P.2d 365 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(12) — 46 cases
Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc, 416 P.3d 824 (Ariz. 2018).
State v. Barraza, 104 P.3d 172 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005).
State v. Decker, 365 P.3d 954 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
State of Arizona v. Andy Daniel Almeida, 356 P.3d 822 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
State v. King, 245 P.3d 938 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(12)(1996) — 1 case
State v. Hussain, 942 P.2d 1168 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(13) — 68 cases
State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Larin, 310 P.3d 990 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “” A.R.S. § 13-105(13). Section 13-704, AR.S.”
State v. Mendoza-tapia, 273 P.3d 676 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
State of Arizona v. Daniel Andrew Snider, 311 P.3d 656 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
State of Arizona v. Debbie Lynn Copeland, 310 P.3d 46 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
State v. Joyner, 158 P.3d 263 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(14) — 22 cases
In Re Andrew C., 160 P.3d 687 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “[2] Subsection 14 of A.R.S. § 13-105, defining "economic loss," was added by Senate Bill 1232 of the 1986 legislative session.”
Town of Gilbert Prosecutor's Off. v. Downie, 189 P.3d 393 (Ariz. 2008).
In Re Stephanie B., 65 P.3d 114 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Madrid, 85 P.3d 1054 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re William L., 119 P.3d 1039 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(15) — 17 cases
State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Larin, 310 P.3d 990 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “” A.R.S. § 13-105(13). Section 13-704, AR.S.”
State of Arizona v. Amy Kay Gustafson, 311 P.3d 258 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
State v. Haney, 219 P.3d 274 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Petersen (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Jones (Ariz. Ct. App. 2024).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(15)(2001) — 1 case
State v. Far West Water & Sewer Inc., 228 P.3d 909 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(16) — 39 cases
State v. Thues, 54 P.3d 368 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002). “” A.R.S. § 13-105(16) (2001). Thues seizes on this latter definition and argues that because the legislature did not authorize imprisonment for a first or second conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia, the offense is not a “felony” and, therefore, cannot be considered a…”
State v. Quijada, 439 P.3d 815 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
State of Arizona v. Summer Lynn Leon, 381 P.3d 286 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Lewandowski, 207 P.3d 784 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
In Re J.U., 384 P.3d 839 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(17) — 6 cases
In Re Robert A., 19 P.3d 626 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
State v. Young, 965 P.2d 37 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).
State v. Cordova, 8 P.3d 1156 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
Baines v. Superior Court in & for Pima Cnty., 688 P.2d 1037 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984).
State v. Flynt, 13 P.3d 1209 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(18) — 12 cases
State v. Large, 321 P.3d 439 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Prince, 250 P.3d 1145 (Ariz. 2011).
State v. Weible, 688 P.2d 1005 (Ariz. 1984).
State v. Heylmun, 708 P.2d 778 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985).
State v. Ceasar, 383 P.3d 1140 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(19) — 4 cases
State v. Medina, 836 P.2d 997 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992).
Mesa v. Hon. driggs/charon (Ariz. Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Oman (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Robinson (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(2) — 5 cases
State v. Henry, 68 P.3d 455 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). “Rather, “benefit” is defined among the definitions for the entire criminal code in § 13-105 and includes “anything of value or advantage,” not merely pecuniary gain.”
Carlos Cruz v. Hon. blair/state of Arizona, 532 P.3d 327 (Ariz. 2023).
State v. Fagnant, 839 P.2d 430 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992).
State v. Sicari (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026).
State of Arizona v. Tyrone Vaughn Henry (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(20) — 1 case
State v. Sanchez, 846 P.2d 857 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(21) — 5 cases
State v. Hamblin, 797 P.2d 1229 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
State v. Sanchez, 956 P.2d 1240 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Moran, 784 P.2d 730 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989).
State v. Young, 670 P.2d 1189 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983).
Frohlich v. City Court, 995 P.2d 714 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22) — 31 cases
State v. Moreno, 655 P.2d 23 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982).
State v. Trujillo, 257 P.3d 1194 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
State of Arizona v. Lee L.N., 340 P.3d 1085 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Rodriguez, 251 P.3d 1045 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
State of Arizona v. Miguel Francisco Inzunza, 316 P.3d 1266 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(a) — 1 case
State v. Lieser (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(a)(1) — 1 case
State v. Cabrera (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(a)(i) — 3 cases
State v. Acosta (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Shoemaker (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Cook (Ariz. Ct. App. 2025).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(a)(ii) — 2 cases
State v. Coffelt (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Luna (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(a)(iii) — 1 case
State of Arizona v. Miguel Francisco Inzunza, 316 P.3d 1266 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(a)(iv) — 3 cases
State v. Hardin (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Martin (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Torres (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(a)(v) — 1 case
State v. Goddard, 261 P.3d 477 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(b) — 11 cases
State v. Diaz, 230 P.3d 705 (Ariz. 2010).
State v. Davis (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
State v. Nunez (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Gonzales-Sandoval (Ariz. Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Purkey (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(c) — 15 cases
State v. Smith, 263 P.3d 675 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Gulley, 382 P.3d 795 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Shakir (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Mendivil (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Lee (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(d) — 32 cases
State v. Johnson, 380 P.3d 99 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “First, § 13-105 provides that its definitions are to control “unless the context otherwise requires.”
State v. Solis, 339 P.3d 668 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Gutierrez, 381 P.3d 254 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Gulley, 382 P.3d 795 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Myers (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(e) — 7 cases
State v. Johnson, 380 P.3d 99 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “First, § 13-105 provides that its definitions are to control “unless the context otherwise requires.”
State v. Dalton, 366 P.3d 133 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
State of Arizona v. Lee L.N., 340 P.3d 1085 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Ceasar, 383 P.3d 1140 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Smith, 263 P.3d 675 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(f) — 1 case
State v. Jackson (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(22)(iv) — 1 case
State of Arizona v. Dave Allen Laporte (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(23) — 7 cases
State v. Gallegos, 870 P.2d 1097 (Ariz. 1994). “This argument implicitly relies on § 13-105(23), which defines a person as a "human being.”
State v. Jackson, 90 P.3d 793 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).
State v. Guadagni, 178 P.3d 473 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Maupin, 801 P.2d 485 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
State v. Roscoe, 897 P.2d 634 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(24) — 5 cases
State Ex Rel. Dean v. Dolny, 778 P.2d 1193 (Ariz. 1989).
State v. Garcia, 673 P.2d 955 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983).
State v. Boudette, 791 P.2d 1063 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
State v. Lawrence, 663 P.2d 580 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982).
State v. McKinley (Ariz. Ct. App. 2024).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(25) — 5 cases
State v. Fontes, 986 P.2d 897 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).
State v. Kerr, 690 P.2d 145 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984).
State v. Kaiser, 65 P.3d 463 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
In Re David H., 967 P.2d 134 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).
State v. White, 701 P.2d 1230 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(25)(2001) — 1 case
State v. Kaiser, 65 P.3d 463 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(26) — 8 cases
State v. Marshall, 4 P.3d 1039 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
United States v. Arizona, 641 F.3d 339 (9th Cir. 2011).
State v. Hazlett, 73 P.3d 1258 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
United States v. Arizona, 703 F. Supp. 2d 980 (D. Ariz. 2010).
State v. Far West Water & Sewer Inc., 228 P.3d 909 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(27) — 7 cases
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Strohson, 945 P.2d 1251 (Ariz. 1997).
State v. Large, 321 P.3d 439 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
Juan Carlos Vicente Sanchez v. Hon. ainley/state of Arizona, 321 P.3d 415 (Ariz. 2014).
State v. Johnson, 693 P.2d 973 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984).
State v. Piotrowski, 315 P.3d 1252 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(28) — 2 cases
State v. Lee, 176 P.3d 712 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
Carlos Cruz v. Hon. blair/state of Arizona, 532 P.3d 327 (Ariz. 2023).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(29) — 17 cases
Est. of braden/gabaldon v. State, 266 P.3d 349 (Ariz. 2011).
State v. Lee, 176 P.3d 712 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
Cherry v. Araneta, 57 P.3d 391 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Encinas, 647 P.2d 624 (Ariz. 1982).
State v. Williams, 644 P.2d 889 (Ariz. 1982).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(3) — 10 cases
State v. Hasson, 177 P.3d 301 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Rodriguez, 735 P.2d 792 (Ariz. 1987).
State v. Griffin, 744 P.2d 10 (Ariz. 1987).
State v. Barnes (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Dixon (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(30) — 26 cases
State v. Cox, 174 P.3d 265 (Ariz. 2007). “¶ 11 The instruction given at trial defined possession using the terminology in A.R.S. § 13-105(30). The judge instructed the jury that “ ‘[pjossess’ means to knowingly exercise dominion or control over property.”
State v. Welch, 12 P.3d 229 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
State v. Cox, 155 P.3d 357 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Leal, 455 P.3d 327 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
State v. Cheramie, 189 P.3d 374 (Ariz. 2008).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(31) — 11 cases
State v. Greene, 898 P.2d 954 (Ariz. 1995).
State v. Jensen, 173 P.3d 1046 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Cox, 155 P.3d 357 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Petrak, 8 P.3d 1174 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
State v. Rushing, 749 P.2d 910 (Ariz. 1988).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(32) — 6 cases
State Ex Rel. Napolitano v. Gravano, 60 P.3d 246 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. W. Union Fin. Servs., Inc., 199 P.3d 592 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Venegas, 669 P.2d 604 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983).
State v. Newfield, 778 P.2d 1366 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989).
State v. Anderson (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(33) — 12 cases
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle, 379 P.3d 197 (Ariz. 2016). “¶17 The plain text of §§ 13-1404(A) and 13-1410(A) defines all the elements of sexual abuse and child molestation.”
State v. Bustamante, 274 P.3d 526 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Venegas, 669 P.2d 604 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983).
State of Arizona v. Amy Kay Gustafson, 311 P.3d 258 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
State v. Haney, 219 P.3d 274 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(34) — 42 cases
State v. George, 79 P.3d 1050 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). “We must therefore determine whether the state presented sufficient evidence from which reasonable jurors could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that the injury had seriously impaired her health or caused her to suffer a protracted impairment of the use of her arm.”
State v. Pena, 104 P.3d 873 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “A "dangerous instrument" is "anything that under the circumstances in which it is used, attempted to be used or threatened to be used is readily capable of causing death or serious physical injury.”
State v. Gonsalves, 297 P.3d 927 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
State of Arizona v. Kevin Ottar & Ruan Junior Hamilton, 302 P.3d 622 (Ariz. 2013).
State v. Lara, 902 P.2d 1337 (Ariz. 1995).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(35) — 10 cases
State v. Sorensen, 531 P.3d 378 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2023).
State of Arizona v. Kevin Ottar & Ruan Junior Hamilton, 302 P.3d 622 (Ariz. 2013).
State v. Wooten (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Green, 431 P.3d 599 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Welvaert (Ariz. Ct. App. 2024).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(36) — 3 cases
In Re Adam P., 34 P.3d 398 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
State v. STRECK, 211 P.3d 1290 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
State of Arizona v. Orvie Rowland Streck (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(37) — 5 cases
State v. McKeon, 38 P.3d 1236 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Garcia, 334 P.3d 1286 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Jensen, 173 P.3d 1046 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Alvarado, 200 P.3d 1037 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Lara, 902 P.2d 1337 (Ariz. 1995).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(38) — 2 cases
State v. McKeon, 38 P.3d 1236 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002).
United States v. Manzo, 851 F. Supp. 2d 797 (D.N.J. 2012).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(39) — 17 cases
State v. Peltz, 391 P.3d 1215 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
In re Jessie T., 399 P.3d 103 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
State of Arizona v. Karama Azizi Mwandishi, 278 P.3d 912 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Kelly, 545 P.3d 478 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Bryant (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(4) — 4 cases
State v. Cowles, 82 P.3d 369 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).
State v. Uriarte, 981 P.2d 575 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).
State v. Gutierrez, 381 P.3d 254 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
Davis v. Adcrr (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(40) — 6 cases
State v. STRECK, 211 P.3d 1290 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Zinsmeyer, 218 P.3d 1069 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
State of Arizona v. Orvie Rowland Streck (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Craft (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State of Arizona v. Dean William Zinsmeyer (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(41) — 3 cases
State of Arizona v. Joann Bon, 338 P.3d 989 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Garcia, 334 P.3d 1286 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Alvarado, 200 P.3d 1037 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(42) — 4 cases
State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer, 303 P.3d 84 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
State of Arizona v. Heulon Colston Brown, 310 P.3d 29 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
Carlos Cruz v. Hon. blair/state of Arizona, 532 P.3d 327 (Ariz. 2023).
State v. George, 313 P.3d 543 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(5) — 10 cases
State v. Morse, 617 P.2d 1141 (Ariz. 1980).
State v. Ramos, 648 P.2d 119 (Ariz. 1982).
State v. Far West Water & Sewer Inc., 228 P.3d 909 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
State v. Barrett, 644 P.2d 242 (Ariz. 1982).
State v. Jackson, 90 P.3d 793 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(5)(C) — 2 cases
State v. Cocio, 709 P.2d 1336 (Ariz. 1985).
Gurule v. Illinois Mut. Life & Cas. Co., 734 P.2d 85 (Ariz. 1987).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(5)(a) — 6 cases
State v. Henley, 687 P.2d 1220 (Ariz. 1984).
State v. Walton, 650 P.2d 1264 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982).
State v. Rhymes, 628 P.2d 939 (Ariz. 1981).
State v. Cantua-Ramirez, 718 P.2d 1030 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986).
State v. Venegas, 669 P.2d 604 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(5)(b) — 6 cases
State v. Malloy, 639 P.2d 315 (Ariz. 1981).
State v. Reffitt, 702 P.2d 681 (Ariz. 1985).
State v. Kozan, 706 P.2d 753 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985).
State v. Frustino, 689 P.2d 547 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984).
State v. Stevens, 744 P.2d 37 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(5)(c) — 17 cases
Rawlings v. Apodaca, 726 P.2d 565 (Ariz. 1986).
State v. Fisher, 686 P.2d 750 (Ariz. 1984).
State v. Henley, 687 P.2d 1220 (Ariz. 1984).
Hoover v. First Interstate Bank, 682 P.2d 469 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984).
Quintero v. Rodgers, 212 P.3d 874 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(5)(d) — 7 cases
State v. Shumway, 672 P.2d 929 (Ariz. 1983).
State v. Walton, 650 P.2d 1264 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982).
State v. Shumway, 672 P.2d 929 (Ariz. 1983).
State v. Cantua-Ramirez, 718 P.2d 1030 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986).
State v. Venegas, 669 P.2d 604 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(6) — 13 cases
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Klein, 150 P.3d 778 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Amaya-Ruiz, 800 P.2d 1260 (Ariz. 1990).
State v. Womack, 847 P.2d 609 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “[3] A.R.S. § 13-105(6), defining culpable mental states, provides: (a) "Intentionally" or "with the intent to" means, with respect to a result or to conduct described by a statute defining an offense, that a person's objective is to cause that result or to engage in that conduct.”
State v. Bridgeforth, 750 P.2d 3 (Ariz. 1988).
State v. Guadagni, 178 P.3d 473 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(6)(B) — 1 case
State v. Womack, 847 P.2d 609 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “[3] A.R.S. § 13-105(6), defining culpable mental states, provides: (a) "Intentionally" or "with the intent to" means, with respect to a result or to conduct described by a statute defining an offense, that a person's objective is to cause that result or to engage in that conduct.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(6)(C) — 1 case
State v. Womack, 847 P.2d 609 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “[3] A.R.S. § 13-105(6), defining culpable mental states, provides: (a) "Intentionally" or "with the intent to" means, with respect to a result or to conduct described by a statute defining an offense, that a person's objective is to cause that result or to engage in that conduct.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(6)(a) — 5 cases
K.B. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 941 P.2d 1288 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Bridgeforth, 750 P.2d 3 (Ariz. 1988).
Repub. Ins. v. Feidler, 875 P.2d 187 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994).
State v. Nunez, 769 P.2d 1040 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989).
State v. Mott, 901 P.2d 1221 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(6)(a)(b) — 1 case
Cretens v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 60 F. Supp. 2d 987 (D. Ariz. 1999).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(6)(b) — 13 cases
State v. Gallegos, 870 P.2d 1097 (Ariz. 1994). “This argument implicitly relies on § 13-105(23), which defines a person as a "human being.”
State v. Cid, 892 P.2d 216 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995).
State v. Kiles, 857 P.2d 1212 (Ariz. 1993).
State v. Smith, 774 P.2d 811 (Ariz. 1989).
State v. Villalobos Alvarez, 745 P.2d 991 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(6)(c) — 11 cases
State v. Gallegos, 870 P.2d 1097 (Ariz. 1994). “This argument implicitly relies on § 13-105(23), which defines a person as a "human being.”
State v. Williams, 854 P.2d 131 (Ariz. 1993).
State v. Vickers, 768 P.2d 1177 (Ariz. 1989).
K.B. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 941 P.2d 1288 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Adams, 745 P.2d 175 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(6)(d) — 4 cases
State v. Nunez, 806 P.2d 861 (Ariz. 1991).
State v. Adams, 745 P.2d 175 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
State v. Ruelas, 798 P.2d 1335 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
State v. Olsen, 760 P.2d 603 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(7) — 17 cases
State v. Cox, 37 P.3d 437 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Borbon, 706 P.2d 718 (Ariz. 1985).
State v. Baldenegro, 932 P.2d 275 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996).
State v. Ochoa, 943 P.2d 814 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Venegas, 669 P.2d 604 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(7)(a) — 2 cases
State v. Johnson, 72 P.3d 343 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Salman, 897 P.2d 661 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(7)(b) — 1 case
State v. Alvarado, 875 P.2d 198 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(8) — 12 cases
State v. Gordon, 778 P.2d 1204 (Ariz. 1989).
State of Arizona v. Christopher Arevalo, 470 P.3d 644 (Ariz. 2020).
State v. Ochoa, 943 P.2d 814 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Mauro, 766 P.2d 59 (Ariz. 1988).
State v. Orduno, 769 P.2d 1010 (Ariz. 1989).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(8)(g) — 1 case
State v. Ochoa, 943 P.2d 814 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(9) — 23 cases
State v. Harm, 340 P.3d 1110 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
State v. Cox, 174 P.3d 265 (Ariz. 2007). “¶ 11 The instruction given at trial defined possession using the terminology in A.R.S. § 13-105(30). The judge instructed the jury that “ ‘[pjossess’ means to knowingly exercise dominion or control over property.”
State v. Brown, 64 P.3d 847 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Henry, 68 P.3d 455 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). “Rather, “benefit” is defined among the definitions for the entire criminal code in § 13-105 and includes “anything of value or advantage,” not merely pecuniary gain.”
State v. Oaks, 104 P.3d 163 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(9)(C) — 1 case
State v. Vandever, 119 P.3d 473 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(9)(a) — 6 cases
State v. Gallegos, 916 P.2d 1056 (Ariz. 1996).
State v. Brown, 64 P.3d 847 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Simpson, 173 P.3d 1027 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
K.B. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 941 P.2d 1288 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
W. Agric. Ins. v. Brown, 985 P.2d 530 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(9)(b) — 7 cases
State v. Simpson, 173 P.3d 1027 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Lee, 959 P.2d 799 (Ariz. 1998).
State v. Jensen, 173 P.3d 1046 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Ovind, 924 P.2d 479 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996).
In re Christopher R., 957 P.2d 1004 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(9)(c) — 11 cases
Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 1121 (9th Cir. 2006). “See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105 (9)(c) (defining recklessness as “consciously disre- gard[ing] a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists,” and providing that “[a] person who creates such a risk but is unaware of such risk…”
State ex rel. Thomas v. Duncan, 165 P.3d 238 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
In Re William G., 963 P.2d 287 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Miles, 123 P.3d 669 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005).
State v. Oaks, 104 P.3d 163 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(9)(d) — 5 cases
State v. Nelson, 150 P.3d 769 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
In Re William G., 963 P.2d 287 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
Bazzanella v. Tucson City Court, 988 P.2d 157 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
State v. Jansing, 918 P.2d 1081 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996).
Carrasco v. State, 19 P.3d 635 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(9)(e) — 4 cases
Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 1121 (9th Cir. 2006). “See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105 (9)(c) (defining recklessness as “consciously disre- gard[ing] a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists,” and providing that “[a] person who creates such a risk but is unaware of such risk…”
State v. Oaks, 104 P.3d 163 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re William G., 963 P.2d 287 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
Repub. Ins. v. Feidler, 969 P.2d 173 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(9)(e)(2001) — 1 case
State v. Far West Water & Sewer Inc., 228 P.3d 909 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105(c) — 1 case
State v. McKinney, 917 P.2d 1214 (Ariz. 1996).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.