Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 13
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1207 (2026)

Prisoners who commit assault with intent to incite to riot or participate in riot; classification

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. A person, while in the custody of the state department of corrections or a county or city jail, who commits assault on another person with the intent to incite to riot or who participates in a riot is guilty of a class 2 felony.

B. A person who is convicted of a violation of this section shall not be eligible for suspension of sentence, probation, pardon or release from confinement on any basis until the sentence imposed by the court has been served or commuted and the sentence shall be consecutive to any other sentence presently being served by the convicted person.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2023 · leading case: State of Arizona v. Matthew Erich Manzanedo, 110 P.3d 1026 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Arizona v. Matthew Erich Manzanedo, 110 P.3d 1026 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 24× “We affirm his convictions and sentences. ¶2 On appeal, Manzanedo argues that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction for criminal damage and that his conviction under A.”
State v. Corrao, 563 P.2d 310 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 6× “§ 13 — 246(A)(6) and A.R.S. § 13-1207. (3) The trial court erred in sentencing appellant pursuant to subsection (B) of A.”
State v. Barr, 565 P.2d 526 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 2× “Appellant requested additional instructions to the effect that he would be entitled to claim self-defense even though he did not retreat, and even though he was armed, as well as a general instruction in the statutory language of A.”
State v. Gary, 543 P.2d 782 (Ariz. 1975). · cites it 3× “Neither was Jackson in the process of becoming the victim of a crime committed by the officer as required by A.R.S. § 13-1207. Defendant’s second theory is likewise unsupported by the evidence.”
State of Arizona v. Nicolas Luviano, 530 P.3d 388 (Ariz. 2023). · cites it 2× “2005) (applying Dixon in finding A.R.S. § 13-1207, which criminalizes a prisoner’s assault with intent to incite to riot, is a single unified offense); State v.”
State v. Carter, 429 P.3d 1176 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “2005) (concluding A.R.S. § 13-1207"creates a single offense that can be committed in alternate ways").”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.