13-1307. Sex trafficking; classification; definitions
A. It is unlawful for a person to knowingly traffic another person who is eighteen years of age or older with either of the following:
1. The intent to cause the other person to engage in any prostitution or sexually explicit performance by deception, force or coercion.
2. The knowledge that the other person will engage in any prostitution or sexually explicit performance by deception, coercion or force.
B. A person who violates this section is guilty of a class 2 felony and the person is not eligible for suspension of sentence, probation, pardon or release from confinement on any basis except as specifically authorized by section 31-233, subsection A or B until the sentence imposed by the court has been served or commuted.
C. For the purposes of this section:
1. "Coercion" includes:
(a) Abusing or threatening to abuse the law or the legal system.
(b) Knowingly destroying, concealing, removing, confiscating, possessing or withholding another person's actual or purported passport or other immigration document, government issued identification document, government record or personal property.
(c) Extortion.
(d) Causing or threatening to cause financial harm to any person.
(e) Facilitating or controlling another person's access to a controlled substance.
2. "Force" includes causing or threatening to cause serious harm to another person or physically restraining or threatening to physically restrain another person.
3. "Sexually explicit performance" means a live or public act or show intended to arouse or satisfy the sexual desires or appeal to the prurient interest of patrons.
4. "Traffic" means to entice, recruit, harbor, provide, transport or otherwise obtain another person.
Notes of Decisions
Applications of Oppenheimer, 389 P.2d 696 (Ariz. 1964).
· cites it 2× “It was established that on the 18th day of March, 1963, the Governor of Arizona honored the demand of the Governor of California and caused to be issued his warrant to hold and transport defendant to the State of California. The fugitive proceeding under which Oppenheimer had…”
State v. Conner, 467 P.3d 246 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).
“) section 13-1307 and 18 United States Code 1 The Honorable Joshua Rogers, Judge of the Arizona Superior Court, has been authorized to sit in this matter pursuant to Article 6, Section 3 of the Arizona Constitution 2 STATE v.”
State Ex Rel. Horne v. Rivas, 250 P.3d 1196 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 2× “The state may serve the complaint in the manner provided by § 13-1307 or by the Arizona rules of civil procedure.”
State v. Espinoza, 276 P.3d 55 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
“Sex trafficking of a minor pursuant to § 13-1307. 15. A second or subsequent violation of indecent exposure to a person under fifteen years of age pursuant to § 13-1402.”
State v. Brown (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 13-1307(A). A person is guilty of receiving the earnings of a prostitute if he “knowingly receives money .”
State v. Hartwell (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
“titution, intending that they act as prostitutes in violation of § 13-3209(2); knowingly received and controlled all proceeds from employees working in his house of prostitution in violation of § 13- 3204; knowingly sex trafficked women over the age of 18 with knowledge that…”
State of Arizona v. Jaime Rene Espinoza (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
“Sex trafficking of a minor pursuant to § 13-1307. 15. A second or subsequent violation of indecent exposure to a person under fifteen years of age pursuant to § 13-1402.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1307(1) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Horne v. Rivas, 250 P.3d 1196 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
“The state may serve the complaint in the manner provided by § 13-1307 or by the Arizona rules of civil procedure.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1307(A) — 1 case
State v. Brown (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
“” A.R.S. § 13-1307(A). A person is guilty of receiving the earnings of a prostitute if he “knowingly receives money .”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1307(A)(2) — 1 case
State v. Hartwell (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
“titution, intending that they act as prostitutes in violation of § 13-3209(2); knowingly received and controlled all proceeds from employees working in his house of prostitution in violation of § 13- 3204; knowingly sex trafficked women over the age of 18 with knowledge that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.