Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2601 (2026)

Definition

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Employee" includes a person employed by an enterprise or an agent or fiduciary of a principal.

2. "Employer" includes an enterprise or principal.

3. "Party officer" means a person who holds any position or office in a political party, whether by election, appointment or otherwise.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2026 · leading case: State v. Francis, 388 P.3d 843 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Francis, 388 P.3d 843 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3× “As defined by statute, contraband means: [A]ny dangerous drug, narcotic drug, marijuana, intoxicating liquor of any kind, deadly weapon, dangerous instrument, explosive, wireless communication device, multimedia storage device or other article whose use or possession would…”
Donahoe v. Arpaio, 869 F. Supp. 2d 1020 (D. Ariz. 2012). “13-1804, and extortion, A.R.S. 13-2601, et seq.; and • Arpaio suffered injury as a result of this pattern of racketeering activity in that he did not get the funding to which he was entitled for his investigation of the Court Tower.”
Beltran v. Beltran (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026). “03(F) provides in part that a parent who has been found to have committed an act of domestic violence in violation of Section 13-2601 may nonetheless be entitled to parenting time if he or she “prov[es] to the court’s satisfaction that parenting time will not endanger the child…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2601(1) — 1 case
State v. Francis, 388 P.3d 843 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “As defined by statute, contraband means: [A]ny dangerous drug, narcotic drug, marijuana, intoxicating liquor of any kind, deadly weapon, dangerous instrument, explosive, wireless communication device, multimedia storage device or other article whose use or possession would…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.