Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2703 (2026)
False swearing; classification
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A. A person commits false swearing by making a false sworn statement, believing it to be false.
B. False swearing is a class 6 felony.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1984–2020 · leading case: Franzi v. Superior Court of Arizona, 679 P.2d 1043 (Ariz. 1984).
Franzi v. Superior Court of Arizona, 679 P.2d 1043 (Ariz. 1984). “In August of 1982, the 51st grand jury for Pima County began an investigation into a contract awarded by the Pima County Board of Supervisors to an Arizona company.”
Franzi v. Superior Court, 679 P.2d 1043 (Ariz. 1984). “§ 13-2702(A), and six counts of false swearing, A.R.S. § 13-2703(A), based on his testimony before a grand jury in Pima County.”
State v. Sommer, 745 P.2d 203 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). “He also suggests that a person who submits a false statement may only be prosecuted pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-2703, false swearing, or § 13-2704, unsworn falsification, unless the false statement is made pursuant to an overall fraudulent scheme or artifice to deceive or defraud.”
Franzi v. Koedyker, 758 P.2d 1303 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “§ 13-2702, and false swearing, A.R.S. § 13-2703. Neither of these crimes is made a predicate offense in the Arizona racketeering definition.”
Donahoe v. Arpaio, 986 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (D. Ariz. 2013). “” A.R.S. § 13-2703(A). For the same reasons discussed above, however, the Addendum and Charging Summary contain no evidence showing Stapley believed his disclosures were false — even if they were incorrect.”
Walker v. Superior Court, 956 P.2d 1246 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998). “section 13-2703 (1989) provides, “A person commits false swearing by making a false sworn statement, believing it to be false____ False swearing is a class 6 felony.”
Domas v. Wilder (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020). “section 13-2703 (state criminal false swearing) and 18 U.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2703(A) — 3 cases
Franzi v. Superior Court of Arizona, 679 P.2d 1043 (Ariz. 1984). “In August of 1982, the 51st grand jury for Pima County began an investigation into a contract awarded by the Pima County Board of Supervisors to an Arizona company.”
Franzi v. Superior Court, 679 P.2d 1043 (Ariz. 1984). “§ 13-2702(A), and six counts of false swearing, A.R.S. § 13-2703(A), based on his testimony before a grand jury in Pima County.”
Donahoe v. Arpaio, 986 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (D. Ariz. 2013). “” A.R.S. § 13-2703(A). For the same reasons discussed above, however, the Addendum and Charging Summary contain no evidence showing Stapley believed his disclosures were false — even if they were incorrect.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.