Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3008 (2026)

Possession of interception devices; classification

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. It is unlawful for a person to have in his possession or control any device, contrivance, machine or apparatus designed or primarily useful for the interception of wire, electronic or oral communications as defined in section 13-3001 with the intent to unlawfully use or employ or allow the device, contrivance, machine or apparatus to be used or employed for the interception, or having reason to know the device, contrivance, machine or apparatus is intended to be so used.

B. All property possessed or controlled by any person in violation of this section is subject to seizure and forfeiture pursuant to chapter 39 of this title.

C. A person who violates this section is guilty of a class 6 felony.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2004–2004 · leading case: In Re Cases Filed by DIRECTV, Inc..

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Cases Filed by DIRECTV, Inc. (D. Ariz. 2004). · cites it 16× “[ 9 ] Forty-eight defendants 10 timely filed notices of joinder, including defendants Mark and Christine Savin who filed a supplemental memorandum 11 moving the court to dismiss plaintiffs claims under A.R.S. § 13-3008(A) and request attorney fees under A.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3008(A) — 1 case

In Re Cases Filed by DIRECTV, Inc. (D. Ariz. 2004). “[ 9 ] Forty-eight defendants 10 timely filed notices of joinder, including defendants Mark and Christine Savin who filed a supplemental memorandum 11 moving the court to dismiss plaintiffs claims under A.R.S. § 13-3008(A) and request attorney fees under A.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.