Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3710 (2026)

Obtaining subscription television services; manufacture, distribution and sale of interception and decoding devices; violation; classification; civil remedy; punitive damages

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. A person who for profit does either of the following is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor:

1. Knowingly attaches or causes to be attached any device or devices to a television set, videotape recorder or other equipment intended to receive television transmissions or incorporates or causes to be incorporated any device into a television set, videotape recorder or other equipment intended to receive television transmissions for the purpose of intercepting or decoding any transmission by a duly licensed over-the-air subscription television service which the person is not authorized by the subscription television service to receive and decode.

2. Manufactures, distributes or sells any device, plan or kit for a device capable of intercepting or decoding transmissions by a duly licensed over-the-air subscription television service, with the intention that such device, plan or kit be used for such intercepting or decoding, unless authorized by the over-the-air subscription television service.

B. A person who suffers injury to his business or property arising out of the violation of this section may maintain an action in the superior court for the recovery of damages or for an injunction, or both. The successful party is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees as fixed by the court.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2004–2019 · leading case: In Re Cases Filed by DIRECTV, Inc., 344 F. Supp. 2d 647 (D. Ariz. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Cases Filed by DIRECTV, Inc., 344 F. Supp. 2d 647 (D. Ariz. 2004). · cites it 21× “Defendants allege that because Arizona’s cable and satellite theft statute, A.R.S. § 13-3710, is analogous to 47 U.S.”

Joe Hand Promotions Inc. v. Gonzalez (D. Ariz. 2019). · cites it 8× “§ 12-541(5) (one-year 9 statute of limitations for actions upon a liability created by statute, other than a penalty or 10 forfeiture).”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3710(A)(1) — 2 cases

In Re Cases Filed by DIRECTV, Inc., 344 F. Supp. 2d 647 (D. Ariz. 2004). “Defendants allege that because Arizona’s cable and satellite theft statute, A.R.S. § 13-3710, is analogous to 47 U.S.”

Joe Hand Promotions Inc. v. Gonzalez (D. Ariz. 2019). “§ 12-541(5) (one-year 9 statute of limitations for actions upon a liability created by statute, other than a penalty or 10 forfeiture).”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3710(A)(2) — 1 case

In Re Cases Filed by DIRECTV, Inc., 344 F. Supp. 2d 647 (D. Ariz. 2004). “Defendants allege that because Arizona’s cable and satellite theft statute, A.R.S. § 13-3710, is analogous to 47 U.S.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3710(B) — 1 case

Joe Hand Promotions Inc. v. Gonzalez (D. Ariz. 2019). “§ 12-541(5) (one-year 9 statute of limitations for actions upon a liability created by statute, other than a penalty or 10 forfeiture).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.