Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3881 (2026)
Arrest; how made; force and restraint
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A. An arrest is made by an actual restraint of the person to be arrested, or by his submission to the custody of the person making the arrest.
B. No unnecessary or unreasonable force shall be used in making an arrest, and the person arrested shall not be subjected to any greater restraint than necessary for his detention.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: State v. Clary, 2 P.3d 1255 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
State v. Clary, 2 P.3d 1255 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000). “Similarly, in A.R.S. § 13-3881 et seq., the legislature addressed itself expressly to the use of force in accomplishing an arrest.”
State v. Stroud, 103 P.3d 912 (Ariz. 2005). “” A.R.S. § 13-3881 (2001). No easily identifiable point defines the moment at which an arrest or custody occurs.”
State v. Mitchell, 62 P.3d 616 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). “While an arrest as defined by § 13-3881 is characterized by actual restraint or submission, the phrase “effecting an arrest” in § 13-2508 connotes successful, effective restraint or submission of the person.”
State v. Mincey, 687 P.2d 1180 (Ariz. 1984). “§ 13-1401 [now A.R.S. § 13-3881]; see State v. Martinez, 122 Ariz.”
State v. Sanchez, 701 P.2d 571 (Ariz. 1985). “” A.R.S. § 13-3881; see also State v. Sanders, 118 Ariz.”
Calnimptewa v. Flagstaff Police Dep't, 30 P.3d 634 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001). “See A.R.S. § 13-3881(A) (2001) (“An arrest is made by an actual restraint of the person to be arrested, or by his submission to the custody of the person making the arrest.”
State v. Matthews, 428 P.3d 198 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018). “¶ 18 The superior court instructed the jury on § 13-3881(A), which provides that "[a]n arrest is made by an actual restraint of the person to be arrested," but declined Matthews's request to instruct on subsection (B), which clarifies that "[n]o unnecessary or unreasonable force…”
State v. Taylor, 808 P.2d 324 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). “§ 13-3903(F) states that "[n]othing in this section shall be construed to affect a police officer's authority to conduct an otherwise lawful search incident to his arrest even though such arrested person is released before being taken to the police station or before a magistrate…”
State v. Cole, 838 P.2d 1351 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “or by his submission to the custody of the person making the arrest’ as required in A.R.S. 13-3881 and Sanchez.” The state appealed.”
State v. Laws, 655 A.2d 1131 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995). “2d 571 (1985), citing Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3881 ; People v. Kosyla, 143 Ill.”
State v. Barker, 253 P.3d 286 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). “” AR.S. § 13-3881(A). Athough an arrest may not be complete until a defendant is actually restrained, the resisting arrest statute is violated if a person prevents or attempts to prevent an officer from “effect ing an arrest.”
State v. Stroud, 88 P.3d 190 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004). “Section 13-3881(A), A.R.S., states that “[a]n arrest is made by an actual restraint of the person to be arrested, or by his submission to the custody of the person making the arrest.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3881(A) — 7 cases
Calnimptewa v. Flagstaff Police Dep't, 30 P.3d 634 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001). “See A.R.S. § 13-3881(A) (2001) (“An arrest is made by an actual restraint of the person to be arrested, or by his submission to the custody of the person making the arrest.”
State v. Taylor, 808 P.2d 324 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). “§ 13-3903(F) states that "[n]othing in this section shall be construed to affect a police officer's authority to conduct an otherwise lawful search incident to his arrest even though such arrested person is released before being taken to the police station or before a magistrate…”
State v. Sanchez, 701 P.2d 571 (Ariz. 1985). “” A.R.S. § 13-3881; see also State v. Sanders, 118 Ariz.”
State v. Cole, 838 P.2d 1351 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “or by his submission to the custody of the person making the arrest’ as required in A.R.S. 13-3881 and Sanchez.” The state appealed.”
State v. Barker, 253 P.3d 286 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). “” AR.S. § 13-3881(A). Athough an arrest may not be complete until a defendant is actually restrained, the resisting arrest statute is violated if a person prevents or attempts to prevent an officer from “effect ing an arrest.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3881(B) — 7 cases
State v. Matthews, 428 P.3d 198 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018). “¶ 18 The superior court instructed the jury on § 13-3881(A), which provides that "[a]n arrest is made by an actual restraint of the person to be arrested," but declined Matthews's request to instruct on subsection (B), which clarifies that "[n]o unnecessary or unreasonable force…”
State v. Estes (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Molinar (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Wilson (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
Manriquez v. Superior, Town of (D. Ariz. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.