Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 13

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-4302

Jurisdiction

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The state may commence a proceeding in the superior court if the property for which forfeiture is sought is within this state at the time of the filing of the action or if the courts of this state have in personam jurisdiction of an owner of or interest holder in the property.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1992–2009 · leading case: State v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc. (2009) ariz · cites it 12× “2569 ; see also A.R.S. § 13-4302 (authorizing forfeiture proceedings "if the property for which forfeiture is sought is within this state at the time of the filing of the action or if the courts of this state have in personam jurisdiction of an owner or interest holder in the…”
State Ex Rel. Neely v. Brown (1993) ariz · cites it 13× “§ 22-201 repealed jurisdiction of the superior courts granted in forfeiture actions pursuant to AR.S. § 13-4302 in cases involving property valued at $5,000 or less.”
State v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc. (2008) arizctapp · cites it 10× “§ 13-4302 (2001), part of Arizona’s civil forfeiture provisions, constrains the court’s jurisdiction to issue pre-forfeiture seizure warrants beyond what is required by our federal and state constitutions. Section 13-4302, entitled “Jurisdiction,” provides as follows: The state…”
State v. One Single Family Residence At 1810 East Second Avenue (1997) arizctapp · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 13-4302. Further, the location of the property within the county is also pertinent to venue.”
In re Approximately $50,000.00 in United States Currency (2000) arizctapp “Both well-established principles are reflected in § 13-4302, which broadly provides that forfeiture proceedings may be commenced “in the superior court if the property for which forfeiture is sought is within this state at the time of the filing of the action.”
State v. Salerno (2007) arizctapp · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 13-4302 (2001). . The record indicates that the State has not refiled any criminal proceedings relating to Salerno's property.”
State v. Brown (1992) arizctapp · cites it 3× “A.R.S. § 13-4302 provides: The state may commence a proceeding in the superior court if the property for which forfeiture is sought is within this state at the time of the filing of the action or if the courts of this state have *106 in personam jurisdiction of an owner of or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.