A. In addition to any other fine or restitution, if a person is convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for a violation of chapter 34 of this title, the court may order the person to pay a fine in one of the following amounts:
1. For a first offense, at least one thousand dollars.
2. For a second or subsequent offense, at least two thousand dollars.
B. The court may suspend the imposition of a fine pursuant to this section if the person agrees to enter a residential drug rehabilitation program approved by the court and to pay for all or a part of the costs associated with the rehabilitation program. On successfully completing the program, the person may apply to the court for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed pursuant to this section. If the person establishes to the satisfaction of the court that the person successfully completed the program, the court may reduce the fine by the amount the person paid to participate in the rehabilitation program. If the person fails to complete the program, the court shall enforce the collection of the entire fine that was imposed pursuant to subsection A.
C. The court shall transmit the monies collected pursuant to this section to the supreme court for the purpose of providing drug treatment services to adult probationers through the community punishment program established in title 12, chapter 2, article 11.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
16
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1959–2022 · leading case:
State v. Hunt, 447 P.2d 896 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968).
State v. Hunt, 447 P.2d 896 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968).
· cites it 23× “§ 13-822, as defined by A.R.S. § 13-821. A.R.S. § 13-822 provides, in part: "A.”
State v. Cutshaw, 437 P.2d 962 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968).
· cites it 17× “The direct information filed charged the four defendants with “ * * * the crime of CONTRIBUTING TO DELINQUENCY OR DEPENDENCY OF A MINOR as follows: “That on or about the 20 day of July 1965, and in Pima County, Arizona, and before the filing of this Information, the said * * *…”
State v. Hunt, 406 P.2d 208 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1965).
· cites it 8× “Hunt of Tucson, Arizona, was charged with one count of aggravated assault and battery upon the person of her five year old daughter, Ernestine (Tina) Hunt, and three misdemeanor counts involving abuse of said child, as follows: Contributory Delinquency and Dependency (A.R.S. §§…”
State v. Bailey, 609 P.2d 78 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980).
· cites it 4× “Appellant was charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-821 and 13-822. 1 The materi *265 al portion of the information charged appellant as follows: [O]n or about the 14th day of December, 1977, Carl P.”
State v. Locks, 382 P.2d 241 (Ariz. 1963).
· cites it 5× “A insofar as it is applicable here, “A person who by any act, causes, encourages or contributes to the * * * delinquency of a child * * * or who for any cause is responsible therefor is guilty of a misdemeanor * * “Delinquency” is defined by A.”
State v. Romero, 336 P.2d 366 (Ariz. 1959).
· cites it 6× “Subsection A of § 13-822 charges that "A person who by any act, causes, encourages or contributes to the * * * delinquency of a child, as defined by § 13-821, or who for any cause is responsible therefor is guilty of a misdemeanor * * " A.R.S. § 13-821 defines such as "any act…”
Brockmueller v. State, 340 P.2d 992 (Ariz. 1959).
· cites it 3× “” A.R.S. § 13-821, Subsection C, defines “delinquency” as: “ * * * any act which tends to debase or injure the morals, health or welfare of a child.”
State v. Hixson, 492 P.2d 747 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972).
· cites it 6× “, all in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-821, 13-822. It further alleged that the defendant’s acts tended to debase and injure the morals, health and welfare of the said minor female.”
State v. Cousin, 664 P.2d 233 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 2× “Our Supreme Court in Sutton and Jerousek found that contributing to the delinquency of a child is a lesser included offense of child molestation under former criminal code provisions A.R.S. §§ 13-821 and 13-653. We note that the definitions of these crimes in the current…”
State v. Sutton, 452 P.2d 110 (Ariz. 1969).
· cites it 3× “§ 13-822 provides: “A person who by any act, causes, encourages or contributes to the dependency or delinquency of a child, as defined by § 13-821 * * * is guilty of a misdemeanor * * A.R.S. § 13-821 provides: “ ‘Delinquency’ means any act which tends to debase or injure the…”
State v. Swafford, 520 P.2d 1151 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1974).
· cites it 3× “” A.R.S. § 13-821 (A), par. 1(g) defines a dependent person as a person under the age of eighteen years whose home, by reason of neglect, cruelty or depravity of his parents, or either of them, is an unfit place for such person.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-821(A) — 1 case
State v. Cutshaw, 437 P.2d 962 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968).
“The direct information filed charged the four defendants with “ * * * the crime of CONTRIBUTING TO DELINQUENCY OR DEPENDENCY OF A MINOR as follows: “That on or about the 20 day of July 1965, and in Pima County, Arizona, and before the filing of this Information, the said * * *…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-821(C) — 1 case
State v. Bailey, 609 P.2d 78 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980).
“Appellant was charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-821 and 13-822. 1 The materi *265 al portion of the information charged appellant as follows: [O]n or about the 14th day of December, 1977, Carl P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.