Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-919 (2026)
Waiver of standards
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The requirements of section 13-916, subsection A, subsection B and subsection F, paragraph 2 may be waived for a county if the case load of adult probation officers supervising persons on intensive probation is not more than fifteen persons and the program requires visual contact with each probationer at least one time a week.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases, 1964–2005 · leading case: State v. Noel, 414 P.2d 162 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966).
State v. Noel, 414 P.2d 162 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966). “, with the crime of possession of a pistol, under the provisions of A.R.S. § 13-919. The facts ■are not disputed.”
State v. Parker, 567 P.2d 319 (Ariz. 1977). “Shortly thereafter, appellant was convicted of a violation of A.R.S. § 13-919, “Possession of [a] pistol by [a] criminal,” by a judge of the Superior Court of Maricopa County.”
State v. Kelly, 112 P.3d 682 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “2d 162 (1966), in which this court addressed the identical issue under a predecessor statute, former A.R.S. § 13-919, which, as reproduced in Noel , provided: “It is unlawful for a person who has been convicted of a crime of violence in any court of the United States, its…”
State v. Patton, 586 P.2d 635 (Ariz. 1978). “There is further evidence, in the presentence report, that after his arrest on this matter he continued to carry a gun and accidentally shot himself in the arm while practicing his quick draw.”
State v. Ortiz, 571 P.2d 1060 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977). “§ 13-916, as amended, and one count of possession of a pistol by a criminal in violation of A.R.S. § 13-919. The counts were severed for the purpose of trial and, having been convicted on both counts, appellant was sentenced to the Arizona State Prison for terms of not less than…”
State v. Wilson, 548 P.2d 23 (Ariz. 1976). “Wilson, appellee/cross-appellant, was convicted, after trial by jury, of possession of a pistol by a criminal in violation of ARS § 13-919. He was convicted as a misdemeanant; fined in the amount of $200, with a surcharge of $20; and was placed on probation for a period of 11…”
People v. Garcia, 595 P.2d 228 (Colo. 1979). “§ 1202(a) (1976); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-919 ; Kan. Stat.”
State v. Skinner, 578 P.2d 196 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1978). “§ 13-245, as amended, and possession of a pistol by a criminal, A.R.S. § 13-919. Prior convictions of grand theft and robbery were alleged by the state.”
State v. Burrola, 669 P.2d 614 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). “2d 162, 164 (1966) (involving A.R.S. § 13-919, predecessor of A.R.S. § 13-3102(A)(4)).”
State v. Piedra, 583 P.2d 1373 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1978). “Appellant was conyicted in the Maricopa County Superior Court of the crime of possession of a pistol by a felon,' in violation of A.R.S. § 13-919. The issues presented to this Court on appeal are: (1) whether the justice of the peace who signed the com *55 plaint had…”
State v. Forteson, 447 P.2d 560 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968). “The defendant has appealed from a conviction of possession of a “pistol” by one who has been convicted of a “crime of violence,” as those terms are defined in A.R.S. § 13-919, and the State has appealed from the dismissal of a count in the criminal complaint charging burglary.”
State v. Sheffield, 396 P.2d 828 (Ariz. 1964). “See A.R.S. § 13-919 (1956). Nor does there appear in the record any other reason why the arresting officer may have sought out the defendant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.