Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-2101 (2026)
Intestate estate; modification by will
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A. Any part of a decedent's estate not effectively disposed of by will passes by intestate succession to the decedent's heirs as prescribed in this chapter, except as modified by the decedent's will.
B. A decedent by will may expressly exclude or limit the right of a person or class to succeed to property of the decedent that passes by intestate succession. If that person or a member of that class survives the decedent, the share of the decedent's intestate estate to which that person or class would have succeeded passes as if that person or each member of that class had disclaimed that person's intestate share.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2022 · leading case: Matter of Est. of Krokowsky, 896 P.2d 247 (Ariz. 1995).
Matter of Est. of Krokowsky, 896 P.2d 247 (Ariz. 1995). “DISCUSSION At the time of decedent’s death, AR.S. § 14-2101 (repealed 1994) provided: “Any part of the estate of a decedent not effectively disposed of by his will passes to his heirs [by intestate succession].”
Jordan v. Burgbacher, 883 P.2d 458 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). “§§ 14-2401 through 14-2403 (allowance in lieu of homestead, exempt property and family allowance); A.R.S. §§ 14-2101 and 2102 (intestate share of surviving spouse); AR.”
Matter of Est. of Jetter, 1997 SD 125 (S.D. 1997). “101 (effective January 1, 1997); ArizRevStatAnn § 14-2101 (effective January 1, 1995); ColoRevStat § 15-11-101 (effective July 1, 1995); Hawaii RevStat § 560:2-101 (effective January 1, 1997); MinnStatAnn § 524.”
Matter of Est. of Mason, 947 P.2d 886 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997). “See A.R.S. §§ 14-2101 to 14-2902 and §§ 14-6101 to 14-6311.”
Est. of Walter v. Walter, 97 P.3d 188 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003). “because all surviving heirs and their families were disinherited in decedent’s will.”
Feitler v. LaChance, 883 P.2d 427 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). “Appellant’s argument is that, as to the investments and the home, Janya died intestate and that under the rules of intestate succession, she is entitled, pursuant to A.R.S. § 14-2101 et seq., to inherit Janya’s property with the exception of the netsukes mentioned in paragraph 7…”
Snyder v. Tucson Police Pub. Saf. Pers. Ret. Sys. Bd., 32 P.3d 420 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001). “See A.R.S. §§ 14-2101 through 14-2907. ¶3 We affirmed that ruling on appeal, rejecting Michael’s and the Board’s arguments that the antiassignment provisions of § 38-850(0 barred Caren from devising her share of the retirement benefits to her parents and that her share was a…”
Snyder v. Tucson Police Pub. Saf. Pers. Ret. Sys. Bd., 8 P.3d 1153 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). “9 And, upon Caren’s death, that share became a part of her estate and inheritable under A.R.S. §§ 14-2101 or 14-2602. ¶7 Finally, appellants argue that the antiassignment provision of A.”
Snyder v. Tucson Police Pub. Saf. Ret. Sys., 32 P.3d 420 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001). “See A.R.S. §§ 14-2101 through 14-2907. ¶ 3 We affirmed that ruling on appeal, rejecting Michael's and the Board's arguments that the antiassignment provisions of § 38-850(C) barred Caren from devising her share of the retirement benefits to her parents and that her share was a…”
Hoyer v. Dougherty (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). “See A.R.S. §§ 14-2101, 14-2106. Under this system, survivors in each generation receive an equal share.”
Snyder v. Tucson Police Psprs Bd., 8 P.3d 1153 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). “[9] And, upon Caren's death, that share became a part of her estate and inheritable under A.R.S. §§ 14-2101 or 14-2602. ¶ 7 Finally, appellants argue that the antiassignment provision of A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-2101(B) — 1 case
Matter of Est. of Krokowsky, 896 P.2d 247 (Ariz. 1995). “DISCUSSION At the time of decedent’s death, AR.S. § 14-2101 (repealed 1994) provided: “Any part of the estate of a decedent not effectively disposed of by his will passes to his heirs [by intestate succession].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.