Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-3107 (2026)

Scope of proceedings; proceedings independent; exception

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless supervised administration as described in article 5 is involved:

1. Each proceeding before the court or registrar is independent of any other proceeding involving the same estate.

2. Petitions for formal orders of the court may combine various requests for relief in a single proceeding if the orders sought may be finally granted without delay. Except as required for proceedings which are particularly described by other sections of this chapter, no petition is defective because it fails to embrace all matters which might then be the subject of a final order.

3. Proceedings for probate of wills or adjudications of no will may be combined with proceedings for appointment of personal representatives.

4. A proceeding for appointment of a personal representative is concluded by an order making or declining the appointment.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2010 · leading case: Marianne Waldow v. James Laporta, 246 P.3d 628 (Ariz. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Marianne Waldow v. James Laporta, 246 P.3d 628 (Ariz. 2010). · cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 14-3107(1); see also Unif. Prob.”

In Re Est. of Mcgathy, 246 P.3d 628 (Ariz. 2010). · cites it 2× “" A.R.S. § 14-3107(1); see also Unif. Prob.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-3107(1) — 2 cases

Marianne Waldow v. James Laporta, 246 P.3d 628 (Ariz. 2010). “” A.R.S. § 14-3107(1); see also Unif. Prob.”

In Re Est. of Mcgathy, 246 P.3d 628 (Ariz. 2010). “" A.R.S. § 14-3107(1); see also Unif. Prob.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.