Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-5307 (2026)

Substitution or resignation of guardian; termination of incapacity

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. On petition of the ward or any person interested in the ward's welfare, or on the court's own initiative, the court shall substitute a guardian and appoint a successor if it is in the best interest of the ward. The court does not need to find that the guardian acted inappropriately to find that the substitution is in the ward's best interest. The guardian and the guardian's attorney may be compensated from the ward's estate for defending against a petition for substitution only for the amount ordered by the court and on petition by the guardian or the guardian's attorney. When substituting a guardian and appointing a successor, the court may appoint an individual nominated by the ward if the ward is at least fourteen years of age and has, in the opinion of the court, sufficient mental capacity to make an intelligent choice. On petition of the guardian, the court may accept a resignation and make any other order that may be appropriate.

B. The ward may petition the court for an order that the ward is no longer incapacitated or petition for substitution of the guardian at any time. A request for this order may be made by informal letter to the court or judge. A person who knowingly interferes with the transmission of this request may be found in contempt of court.

C. An interested person, other than the guardian or ward, shall not file a petition for adjudication that the ward is no longer incapacitated earlier than one year after the order adjudicating incapacity was entered unless the court permits it to be made on the basis of affidavits that there is reason to believe that the ward is no longer incapacitated.

D. An interested person, other than the guardian or ward, shall not file a petition to substitute a guardian earlier than one year after the order adjudicating incapacity was entered unless the court permits it to be made on the basis of affidavits that there is reason to believe that the current guardian will endanger the ward's physical, mental or emotional health if not substituted.

E. Before substituting a guardian, accepting the resignation of a guardian or ordering that a ward's incapacity has terminated, the court, following the same procedures to safeguard the rights of the ward as apply to a petition for appointment of a guardian, may send an investigator to the residence of the present guardian and to the place where the ward resides or is detained to observe conditions and report in writing to the court.

F. On termination of the incapacity, the supreme court shall transmit the order terminating the incapacity to the department of public safety. The department of public safety shall transmit the information to the national instant criminal background check system.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship Of: Robert Sommer, 386 P.3d 1281 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship Of: Robert Sommer, 386 P.3d 1281 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “5 It is trae that the probate court may substitute a guardian or conservator, accept the resignation of guardian or conservator, and determine the ward is no longer incapacitated, all under its own initiative, under A.R.S. §§ 14-5307, 14-5415. But these sua sponte actions are…”

Sanders v. Novick, 729 P.2d 960 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “, A.R.S. § 14-5307. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.”

In the Matter of D. Tsosie (Ariz. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “Although the Public Fiduciary does have the statutory right to question the appointment and provide evidence that there is a person “qualified and willing to act” as guardian, nothing in law allows the Public Fiduciary to unilaterally nullify the court’s order imposing the…”

Govuveia v. Gruler (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “Accordingly, the superior court abused its discretion by not deciding, based on the recommendations, whether it was in Joey’s best interests to modify his guardianship under Section 14-5307. 8 GOUVEIA, et al. v. GRULER Opinion of the Court V.”

Shaw v. Ardi (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). “Section 14-5307(A) allows guardians and their counsel to be compensated from the ward’s estate for defending against a petition for substitution, but “only for the amount ordered by the court and on petition by the guardian or the guardian’s attorney.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-5307(A) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.