15-255. Annual report; contents; definition
A. The superintendent of public instruction shall make a report to the governor and the legislature on or before January 15 each year. The report shall be in printed form.
B. The report shall contain:
1. A full statement of the condition and amount of all funds and property apportioned for the purpose of education.
2. The total current expenditures per pupil and separate per pupil amounts for classroom supplies, classroom instruction excluding classroom supplies, district and school administration, support services-students, and all other support services and operations. These per pupil amounts shall be calculated for the state by type of district or school. The method of calculating these per pupil amounts shall be as prescribed in the uniform system of financial records.
3. The number and grades of schools in each county.
4. The number of children attending schools.
5. The average number of children who have attended the schools during each of the two years previous to July 1 of the year in which the report is made.
6. The number of children attending private schools.
7. The amount of school monies derived from county taxes.
8. The amount of school monies derived other than by county taxes.
9. The amount of federal monies that was received during the previous year and that was specified for Indian education aid and emergency operational aid.
10. The amounts expended for salaries of teachers and superintendents and for building of schools.
11. A statement of plans for the management of schools.
12. Such other information relating to the educational interests of this state as the superintendent deems expedient.
C. In addition to the printed report required by subsections A and B of this section, the superintendent of public instruction shall make available in electronic form a supplemental report that provides detail regarding current expenditures by function code for each individual school district. For the purposes of this subsection, "function code" means the function codes defined in the uniform system of financial records provided for in section 15-272.
D. For the purposes of this section, "type of district or school" means accommodation school, unified school district, common school district not within the boundaries of a high school district, common school district within the boundaries of a high school district, high school district, career technical education district and charter school.
Notes of Decisions
Johnson v. Bd. of Educ., 419 P.2d 52 (Ariz. 1966).
· cites it 7× “§ 15-254 only allows a hearing for the dismissal or termination of continuing teachers, and A.R.S. § 15-255 allows an appeal from this hearing.”
Bd. of Educ. of Tempe Union High Sch. v. Lammle, 596 P.2d 48 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979).
· cites it 4× “10, supra) dealing with dismissals of continuing teachers were decided under a judicial review statute (formerly A.R.S. § 15-255, repealed, Laws 1974, ch.”
Forman v. Creighton Sch. Dist. No. 14, 351 P.2d 165 (Ariz. 1960).
· cites it 6× “A.R.S. § 15-255 expressly so provides; and furthermore the legislature has directed that such a matter be advanced on the calendar for prompt disposition.”
Kimball v. Shofstall, 494 P.2d 1357 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972).
· cites it 4× “§ 15-255 was applicable, the Superior Court action would not have been timely as that section requires that the Superior Court action be filed within ten days and Maricopa County would not have been the appropriate county for the suit since that section provides that the suit be…”
Indian Oasis Sch. Dist. No. 40 & Bd. of Trs. v. Zambrano, 526 P.2d 408 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1974).
· cites it 6× “§ 15-252 under the old statute served two functions: (1) Notice of the reasons for dismissal so that the teacher knew what to defend against if he requested a hearing and (2) a record in case the teacher wished to appeal to the superior court pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-255…”
Fulton v. Dysart Unified Sch. Dist. No. 89, 651 P.2d 369 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982).
· cites it 2× “§ 41-785(F) provides in part that: “The court shall review the hearing on the basis of the transcript and exhibits,” with certain exceptions not pertinent here. The adoption, in A.R.S. § 15-543 of the limited scope of review prescribed by A.”
Flowing Wells Sch. Dist. v. Stewart, 499 P.2d 750 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972).
· cites it 8× “§ 15-252 under the old statute served two functions: (1) Notice of the reasons for dismissal so that the teacher knew what to defend against if he requested a hearing and (2) a record in case the teacher wished to appeal to the superior court pursuant to A.”
Kersey v. Maine Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 10, 394 P.2d 201 (Ariz. 1964).
· cites it 2× “Thereafter, she duly appealed to the superior court for a trial de novo pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-255. At the trial de novo, testimony established such complaints as that some children were not allowed to go to the rest rooms without facing loss of recess time; a child who…”
Williams v. Sch. Dist. No. 40 of Gila Cnty., 417 P.2d 376 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966).
· cites it 2× “An appeal was perfected to the Superior Court of Gila County, Arizona, in accordance with the provisions of A.R.S. § 15-255. Appeal is taken from an order of the Superior Court affirming the dismissal by the School Board and from the denial of a motion for a new trial.”
Rottenberg v. Cartwright Sch. Dist. No. 83, 528 P.2d 859 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1974).
· cites it 2× “§ 15-254 requires not only that there be a hearing but that there must be “good and just cause” for the non-renewal of the contract, which cause shall not include “religious or political beliefs or affiliations” with certain statutory exceptions.”
Richard Anderson v. Valley Union High Sch. Dist. 22 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 4× “Subsection (A) specified the time for the appeal and the superior court that would hear it, while subsection (B) specified the manner in which the court‘s review would occur, namely by an expedited ―de novo‖ hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.