Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 15
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 15-724 (2026)

Purchase of high school textbooks, subject matter materials and supplementary books; budget; rental

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The governing board may include in its proposed school district budget finances required for the purchase of textbooks, subject matter materials and supplementary books for the use of registered high school pupils.

B. The governing board may charge a reasonable rental fee for the use of nonrequired textbooks, nonrelated subject matter materials and supplementary books by registered high school pupils.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1960–1981 · leading case: Harris v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 528 F. Supp. 987 (D. Ariz. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harris v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 528 F. Supp. 987 (D. Ariz. 1981). · cites it 4× “Although the Board is independent to the extent it is a body corporate and may sue and be sued, Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 15-724, see Hutchison v.”
Bd. of Regents of the Universities & State Coll. v. City of Tempe, 356 P.2d 399 (Ariz. 1960). · cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 15-724, as amended by § 15-729, provides: “A.”
New v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 618 P.2d 238 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 4× “[3] ARCP, rule 73(i) in effect at the time of this appeal has been abrogated and replaced by ARCAP, rule 10(c), however, that has no substantive bearing on this case. That rule provides: 1. If the appellant is unable to give bond for costs on appeal he may nevertheless prosecute…”
Ashton Co. v. City of Tucson, 441 P.2d 275 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 4× “By statute the Board has `jurisdiction and control over the university' and may `[e]nact ordinances for the government of the institutions under its jurisdiction' (A.R.S. §§ 15-724, 15-725). It has also been authorized to undertake specific construction projects at the…”
Commc'ns Workers of Am. v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 498 P.2d 472 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 2× “Under A.R.S. § 15-724 the Board of Regents is an autonomous body in that § 15— 724, subsec.”
Pratt v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 520 P.2d 514 (Ariz. 1974). “” § 15-724 (B) A.R.S. We are then concerned with only one question and that is: Does the provision of the Arizona State Constitution, Art.”
State ex rel. State Cmty. Coll. Bd. v. Sergent, Hauskins & Beckwith, Inc., 556 P.2d 23 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 2× “See 53 C.J. S. Limitations of Actions § 16 (1948).”
Arizona State Tax Comm'n v. Reiser, 495 P.2d 1342 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 15-724 provides that “[t]he board of regents shall be a body corporate with perpetual succession.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 15-724(A) — 1 case
New v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 618 P.2d 238 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). “[3] ARCP, rule 73(i) in effect at the time of this appeal has been abrogated and replaced by ARCAP, rule 10(c), however, that has no substantive bearing on this case. That rule provides: 1. If the appellant is unable to give bond for costs on appeal he may nevertheless prosecute…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.