Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 17-314 (2026)

Illegally taking, wounding, killing or possessing wildlife; civil penalty; enforcement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The commission may impose a civil penalty against any person for unlawfully taking, wounding, killing or possessing any of the following wildlife, or part thereof, to recover the following minimum sums:

1. For each turkey or javelina     $ 500.00

2. For each bear, mountain lion, pronghorn (antelope)

or deer $1,500.00

3. For each elk or eagle, other than

endangered species  $2,500.00

4. For each predatory, fur-bearing or nongame animal $ 250.00

5. For each small game or aquatic wildlife animal    $  50.00

6. For each bighorn sheep, bison (buffalo)

or endangered species animal    $8,000.00

B. The commission may bring a civil action in the name of this state to enforce the civil penalty. The civil penalty, or a verdict or judgment to enforce the civil penalty, shall not be less than the sum fixed in this section. The minimum sum that the commission may recover from a person pursuant to this section may be doubled for a second violation, verdict or judgment and tripled for a third violation, verdict or judgment. The action to enforce the civil penalty may be joined with an action for possession and recovery had for the possession as well as the civil penalty.

C. The pendency or determination of an action to enforce the civil penalty or for payment of the civil penalty or a judgment, or the pendency or determination of a criminal prosecution for the same taking, wounding, killing or possession, is not a bar to the other, nor does either affect the right of seizure under any other provision of the laws relating to game and fish.

D. All monies recovered pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the wildlife theft prevention fund established by section 17-315.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: State v. Barr, 175 P.3d 694 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Barr, 175 P.3d 694 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 3× “The amendment merely reorganized the statute and added penalties and disabilities imposed by the game and fish commission pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 17-314 or 17-340 as additional items unaffected by an order setting aside a criminal conviction.”
State v. Zaputil, 207 P.3d 678 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). “The department of transportation pursuant to § 28-3304, 28-3306, 28-3307, 28-3308 or 28-3319, except that the conviction may be used as a conviction if such conviction would be admissible had it not been set aside and may be pleaded and proved in any subsequent prosecution of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.