Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 18-604 (2026)

Consultation with applicable agencies; admission authority; state properties available for use

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

18-604. Consultation with applicable agencies; admission authority; state properties available for use

A. The chief executive officer must consult with an applicable agency before admitting an applicant into the property technology sandbox. This consultation may include seeking information about:

1. Whether the applicable agency previously has either:

(a) Issued a license or other authorization to the applicant.

(b) Investigated, sanctioned or pursued legal action against the applicant.

2. Whether the applicant could obtain authorization from an applicable agency after exiting the property technology sandbox.

B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, the chief executive officer has sole authority to make the final decision whether to admit an applicant into the property technology sandbox, except that the chief executive officer may not admit an applicant whose innovation should be regulated pursuant to title 41, chapter 55 or whose innovation involves physical construction that requires a contractor license pursuant to title 32, chapter 10.

C. The department of administration shall provide to the Arizona commerce authority a list of state-owned buildings and properties that are available for a sandbox participant to use.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1989–1999 · leading case: State v. Tarango, 914 P.2d 1300 (Ariz. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Tarango, 914 P.2d 1300 (Ariz. 1996). “§ 13-604(K) supports the court’s conclusion that the release eligibility conditions of § 18-604 control over the release eligibility conditions of § 13-3408(D).”

State v. Michael, 778 P.2d 1278 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “1980) (the fact that the victim does not actually see the weapon itself is of no import in determining whether a deadly weapon has been used or exhibited to justify an allegation of dangerousness pursuant to A.R.S. § 18-604®). Verdicts Involving Victim Linda P.”

State v. Leon, 3 P.3d 968 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). “02(A) *50 enhances punishment whenever a defendant is on release or has escaped from confinement for a prior offense which “resulted] in serious physical injury,” whereas § 18-604 requires either the “intentional or knowing infliction of serious physical injury” in order for a…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.