A. A state grand jury shall consist of the same number of members as a county grand jury. The residence and qualifications of the members of the state grand jury shall be determined according to rules adopted by the supreme court which, at its discretion, depending on the nature of the matters to be investigated, may permit the jury members to be residents of either one county or several counties.
B. The jury commissioner of the county in which the assignment judge is serving shall cause the panel members to be summoned for service.
C. Judicial supervision of the state grand jury shall be maintained by the assignment judge and all indictments, presentments and formal returns of any kind made by a state grand jury shall be returned to the assignment judge.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
1
case, 1980–1980 · leading case:
State v. Fendler, 622 P.2d 23 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980).
State v. Fendler, 622 P.2d 23 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980).
· cites it 4× “See A.R.S. § 21-423(A). This fact alone fails to even make out a prima facie showing of “actual prejudice” since a defendant is not entitled to be tried or investigated by any particular juror or jurors from separate geographical areas.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 21-423(A) — 1 case
State v. Fendler, 622 P.2d 23 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980).
“See A.R.S. § 21-423(A). This fact alone fails to even make out a prima facie showing of “actual prejudice” since a defendant is not entitled to be tried or investigated by any particular juror or jurors from separate geographical areas.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 21-423(B) — 1 case
State v. Fendler, 622 P.2d 23 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980).
“See A.R.S. § 21-423(A). This fact alone fails to even make out a prima facie showing of “actual prejudice” since a defendant is not entitled to be tried or investigated by any particular juror or jurors from separate geographical areas.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.