Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 22
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 22-262 (2026)

Appeals procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The procedure for appeals from a justice court to the superior court shall be as provided by rules adopted by the supreme court.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1965–2013 · leading case: DNB Constr., Inc. v. Superior Court, 607 P.2d 380 (Ariz. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
DNB Constr., Inc. v. Superior Court, 607 P.2d 380 (Ariz. 1980). · cites it 3× “§ 22-242 to set forth the terms of the judgment in the docket and sign it.”
Morgan v. Cont'l Mortg. Investors, 491 P.2d 475 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 22-262, subsec. A calls for approval by the justice of the peace.”
Hampton v. Chatwin, 505 P.2d 1037 (Ariz. 1973). · cites it 2× “Within the 10 day period required by § 22-262 A.R.S., the defendant filed a written notice of appeal and timely and properly served a copy on the adverse party, and filed a motion to permit him to appeal in forma pauperis without prepayment of bond, together with an affidavit of…”
Blair v. Stump, 617 P.2d 791 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “Appeals from civil judgments in justice courts, other than forcible entry and detain-er judgments, require merely the filing of “a bond, which shall be approved by the justice, in an amount equal to the judgment and accrued costs.”
Jordan v. McClennen, 307 P.3d 999 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 22-262 (West 2013) (“The procedure for appeals from a justice court to the superior court shall be as provided by rules promulgated by the supreme court.”
City of Tucson v. Superior Court of Pima Cnty., 406 P.2d 227 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1965). · cites it 7× “” The plaintiffs contend that the above quoted A.R.S. § 22-262 is a special statute governing appeals in justice court and therefore there is no need to apply the general procedure statute, A.”
JNS Holding Corp. v. Superior Court, 900 P.2d 1234 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 4× “Laws 24, codified at A.R.S. § 22-262, repealed by 1981 Ariz.Sess.”
McClintock v. Serv-Us Bakers, 423 P.2d 722 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967). “Section 22-262 amended. The McClintock-Riddel motion for summary judgment further recites: “October 16, 1964 -------Serv-Us Bakers through its attorney filed Motion to Set Aside Default and Default Judgment.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 22-262(A) — 1 case
Blair v. Stump, 617 P.2d 791 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). “Appeals from civil judgments in justice courts, other than forcible entry and detain-er judgments, require merely the filing of “a bond, which shall be approved by the justice, in an amount equal to the judgment and accrued costs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.