Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 22-320 (2026)
Trial by jury
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A trial by jury shall be had if demanded by either the state or defendant if otherwise authorized by law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1965–2008 · leading case: Benitez v. Dunevant, 979 P.2d 1017 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
Benitez v. Dunevant, 979 P.2d 1017 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). “2d at 485-86 (stating that A.R.S. §§ 22-320 through 22-326 apply "equally to trials in justice and police courts").”
Manic v. Dawes, 141 P.3d 732 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006). “Unless the demand is made before commencement of the trial, a trial by jury shall be deemed waived.”
Goldman v. Kautz, 531 P.2d 1138 (Ariz. 1975). “Unless the demand is made before commencement of the trial, a trial by jury shall be deemed waived." We do not think the quoted section grants a substantive right, but, rather, was intended to be procedural and must be read as meaning that a trial by jury shall be had if…”
St. Ex Rel. De Concini v. City Ct. of City of Tucson, Pima Cnty., 454 P.2d 192 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969). “See A.R.S. § 22-320, subsec. A. Though I am still impressed with the validity of the reasoning employed in Tsipai , I cannot reconcile it with a subsequent decision of our Supreme Court, O'Neill v.”
City of Phoenix v. Jones, 541 P.2d 424 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). “The right to trial by jury in non-record courts is set forth in A.R.S. § 22-320 dealing with justice of the peace courts and A.”
Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima Cnty., 410 P.2d 479 (Ariz. 1966). “This procedure is found in the 1956 codification as A.R.S. § 22-320 which states : “A. A trial by jury shall be had if demanded by either the state or defendant.”
State ex rel. Wangberg v. Smith, 118 P.3d 49 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “He alleged that he was entitled by the terms of A.R.S. § 22-320 to a trial by jury if he demanded one.”
Arizona Dep't of Econ. Sec. v. Reinstein, 150 P.3d 782 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “Unless the demand is made before commencement of the trial, a trial by jury shall be deemed waived. Id. The court wrote: We do not think the quoted section grants a substantive right, but, rather, was intended to be procedural and must be read as meaning that a trial by jury…”
Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima Cnty., 402 P.2d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1965). “The provision pertaining to jury trials became A.R.S. § 22-320 in Ch. 3 of Tit. 22, which pertains to "Criminal Proceedings in Justice Courts.”
State Ex Rel. Dean v. City Court of Tucson, 687 P.2d 369 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). “Appellee urges that she is entitled to a jury trial by virtue of A.R.S. § 22-320, as well as both the state and federal constitutional provisions guaranteeing the right to trial by jury in criminal cases.”
State Ex Rel. Brannan v. Williams, 171 P.3d 1248 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “2d 1138, 1139 (1975) ("We do not think [A.R.S. § 22-320] grants a substantive right, but, rather, was intended to be procedural and must be read as meaning that a trial by jury shall be had if demanded In [sic] cases where a jury trial is appropriate.”
Phoenix City Prosecutor's Off. v. Ybarra, 160 P.3d 695 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “See A.R.S. § 22-320(A) (2002) (stating jury demand by state or defendant must be made at least five days before trial or deemed waived).”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 22-320(A) — 6 cases
Phoenix City Prosecutor's Off. v. Ybarra, 160 P.3d 695 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “See A.R.S. § 22-320(A) (2002) (stating jury demand by state or defendant must be made at least five days before trial or deemed waived).”
State v. Harrison, 792 P.2d 779 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
Benitez v. Dunevant, 979 P.2d 1017 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). “2d at 485-86 (stating that A.R.S. §§ 22-320 through 22-326 apply "equally to trials in justice and police courts").”
Phoenix City Prosecutor's Off. v. Ybarra, 182 P.3d 1166 (Ariz. 2008).
Phoenix City Prosecutor v. Hon. ybarra/landers (Ariz. 2008).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 22-320(B) — 2 cases
Benitez v. Dunevant, 979 P.2d 1017 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). “2d at 485-86 (stating that A.R.S. §§ 22-320 through 22-326 apply "equally to trials in justice and police courts").”
State ex rel. Romley v. Johnson, 993 P.2d 453 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.