A. The defendant, at any time after arrest, and before conviction, shall be eligible for bail, subject to section 13-3961 and any applicable rules adopted by the supreme court.
B. The presiding magistrate shall:
1. Prepare a schedule of traffic violations not involving the death of a person or any felony traffic offense, listing specific bail for each violation.
2. Permit the collection of bail, or acceptance of proper bond in lieu of bail, according to the foregoing schedule for and on behalf of the court.
C. The presiding magistrate shall prepare a schedule of civil traffic violations, listing a specific deposit for each violation. The presiding magistrate shall ensure that proper deposits for civil traffic violations are accepted for and on behalf of the court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 1977–2003 · leading case:
Smith v. Cada, 562 P.2d 390 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977).
Smith v. Cada, 562 P.2d 390 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977).
· cites it 9× “This argument fails to consider the effect of A.R.S. § 22-424 which provides: “§ 22-424.”
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Rayes, 75 P.3d 148 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 7× “2 In Klein , this court considered whether a defendant was deprived of his right to bail as set forth under A.R.S. § 22-424. 147 Ariz. at 79 , 708 P.”
Van Herreweghe v. Burke, 36 P.3d 65 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 6× “See A.R.S. § 22-424. 2 He contends that the omission of felony offenses unreasonably interferes with a defendant’s right to gather exculpatory evidence.”
State v. Klein, 708 P.2d 758 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985).
· cites it 26× “The state argues that the master bail schedule provided for by the terms of A.R.S. § 22-424 applies only to misdemeanors, including the charge of driving while intoxicated, and that it does not apply to the more serious felony charge.”
Creamer v. Raffety, 699 P.2d 908 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984).
· cites it 4× “It is uncontroverted that the City of Will-cox bail schedule contained bail amounts for traffic offenses in compliance with A.R.S. § 22-424 as well as selected non-traffic offenses.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 22-424(B) — 1 case
State v. Klein, 708 P.2d 758 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985).
“The state argues that the master bail schedule provided for by the terms of A.R.S. § 22-424 applies only to misdemeanors, including the charge of driving while intoxicated, and that it does not apply to the more serious felony charge.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.