Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 23
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-1030 (2026)

Effect on employers' liability law

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall not be construed as having repealed the sections of the statutes commonly known as the employers' liability law.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1967–1975 · leading case: Williams v. Magma Copper Co., 425 P.2d 138 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Williams v. Magma Copper Co., 425 P.2d 138 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967). · cites it 2× “The appellant argues that because the Workmen’s Compensation Act specifically *237 states that it “ * * * shall not be construed as having repealed the sections of the statutes commonly known as the empolyers’ liability law”, A.”
Myers v. Rollette, 429 P.2d 677 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967). “In the same legislative session which approved the proposed constitutional amendment, the Legislature also adopted a Workmen’s Compensation Law, the same to become effective upon the approval by the people of the constitutional amendment. The Workmen’s Compensation Law now…”
Mariscal v. Am. Smelting & Refining Co., 536 P.2d 1053 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 2× “However, although the Employer’s Liability Law has not been repealed by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, A.R.S. § 23-1030, the exclusivity provisions of A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.