Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-108.02 (2026)
Administrative law judges
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A. The commission shall appoint administrative law judges of the commission who shall be members of the Arizona state bar.
B. The annual compensation of the chief administrative law judge and of the administrative law judges shall be as determined pursuant to section 38-611.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1972–2023 · leading case: Koval v. Indus. Comm'n, 532 P.2d 549 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975).
Koval v. Indus. Comm'n, 532 P.2d 549 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). “See A.R.S. § 23-108.02 and A.R.S. § 23-942. Finally, a jurisdictional point must be addressed, even though not raised on a cross-petition for certiorari by the respondents.”
Garza v. Indus. Comm'n, 501 P.2d 399 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972). “In our opinion we quoted A.R.S. § 23-1061, subsec.”
Chavez v. Indus. Comm'n, 575 P.2d 340 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977). “However, since 1974, awards of the Industrial Commission are being made by a single hearing officer (who review his or her own award) and who must be a lawyer and a member of the State Bar A.R.S. § 23-108.02. In short, this court is now reviewing one man decisions dealing with…”
McDermott v. balfour/starr (Ariz. Ct. App. 2023). “¶15 Under A.R.S. §§ 23-108.02(A) and -941(C), the Commission itself does not hear ICA claim disputes, but rather refers cases to an ALJ Division for adjudication and decision.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-108.02(A) — 1 case
McDermott v. balfour/starr (Ariz. Ct. App. 2023). “¶15 Under A.R.S. §§ 23-108.02(A) and -941(C), the Commission itself does not hear ICA claim disputes, but rather refers cases to an ALJ Division for adjudication and decision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.