Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-1323 (2026)

Injunctive relief; damages

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Unlawful picketing, trespassory assembly, unlawful mass assembly, concerted interference with lawful exercise of business activity and engaging in a secondary boycott are illegal and a person against whom any of these activities is directed or who is injured by these activities is entitled to injunctive relief from these activities. Any person or persons calling or conducting any of these activities is liable to any person injured by these activities for damages, prejudgment interest, litigation costs and reasonable attorney fees. These damages include lost sales and business, lost profits and loss in value of the business. If a person calling or conducting these activities acted in bad faith or disobeyed a court order, including an injunction issued pursuant to this subsection, the person is liable for punitive damages.

B. Nothing in this article shall be construed to imply the legality of any act or conspiracy illegal under the laws of this state before November 24, 1952. Any labor organization, subdivision or local thereof shall be bound by and liable for the acts of its agents, and may sue or be sued in its common name.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1982–2013 · leading case: United Food & Com. Workers Local 99 v. Bennett, 934 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Ariz. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United Food & Com. Workers Local 99 v. Bennett, 934 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Ariz. 2013). · cites it 14× “§ 23-1324 imposes criminal penalties for engaging in concerted interference and A.R.S. § 23-1323 allows a person against whom the.”

Diluzio v. United Elec., Radio & Mach. Wkrs. of Am., 435 N.E.2d 1027 (Mass. 1982). “Code §§ 6-7-80 , 6-7-81; Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 23-1323 (1971); Conn.”

DiLuzio v. United Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers of Am., 435 N.E.2d 1027 (Mass. 1982). “Code §§ 6-7-80 , 6-7-81; Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 23-1323 (1971); Conn.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-1323(A) — 1 case

United Food & Com. Workers Local 99 v. Bennett, 934 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Ariz. 2013). “§ 23-1324 imposes criminal penalties for engaging in concerted interference and A.R.S. § 23-1323 allows a person against whom the.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.