Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-1389 (2026)
Waiver of fine, surcharge or assessment
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The court shall not waive a fine or assessment imposed pursuant to this article or a surcharge imposed pursuant to section 12-116.01 or 12-116.02 for a conviction of an offense listed in this article.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2010–2015 · leading case: State v. McDonagh, 304 P.3d 212 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
State v. McDonagh, 304 P.3d 212 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “¶ 16 The State argues that AR.S. § 28-1389 provides evidence of clear legislative intent to authorize the cumulative Assessments imposed here.”
State v. Rogers, 251 P.3d 1042 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010). “01 generally are “nonwaivable in DUI eases under A.R.S. § 28-1389.” Section 28-1389 states that “[n]otwithstanding any other law, the court shall not waive a fine or assessment imposed pursuant to this article or a surcharge imposed pursuant to § 12-116.”
State of Arizona v. James A. Rogers (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010). “01 generally are “nonwaivable in DUI cases 3 under A.R.S. § 28-1389.” Section 28-1389 states that “[n]otwithstanding any other law, the court shall not waive a fine or assessment imposed pursuant to this article or a surcharge imposed pursuant to § 12-116.”
State v. Fingi (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “§ 28-1383(J)(2)–(5) (listing the mandatory minimum fines for a DUI conviction); see also A.R.S. § 28-1389 (“[The] court shall not waive a fine or assessment imposed pursuant to this article”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.