Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 28
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-442 (2026)

Records; evidence

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. A certified duplicate is deemed an original for all purposes and is admissible in evidence without further foundation in all courts or administrative agencies.

B. The display by a person of evidence on a wireless communication device pursuant to this title does not constitute consent for law enforcement to access other content of the wireless communication device.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1987–2006 · leading case: State v. King, 146 P.3d 1274 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. King, 146 P.3d 1274 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “They were, in fact, certified and authenticated and, therefore, were “admissible in evidence without further foundation,” A.R.S. § 28-442, and “without further proof of their authenticity,” A.”
State v. Johnston, 731 P.2d 638 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Under authority of A.R.S. § 28-442, Arizona could have revoked appellee’s nonresident privilege to operate his vehicle in Arizona under his valid Montana license.”
Welch v. Alabama Dep't of Pub. Saf., 519 So. 2d 517 (Ala. 1987). ““Under authority of A.R.S. § 28-442, Arizona could have revoked appellee’s nonresident privilege to operate his vehicle in Arizona under his valid Montana license.”
State of Arizona v. Steven James King (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “They were, in fact, certified and authenticated and, therefore, were “admissible in evidence without further foundation,” A.R.S. § 28-442, and “without further proof of their authenticity,” A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.