Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-8428 (2026)

Liability; airport police and aides

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The governing body of each airport appointing an airport police officer or airport police aide is liable for any and all acts of the airport police officer or airport police aide that are within the scope of the officer's or aide's employment.

B. This state or any political subdivision is not liable for any act or failure to act by an airport police officer or airport police aide, unless this state or a political subdivision is the governing body of the airport.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma Cnty. Airport Auth., 361 P.3d 379 (Ariz. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma Cnty. Airport Auth., 361 P.3d 379 (Ariz. 2015). · cites it 6× “¶ 18 Finally, DBT Yuma’s reliance on A.R.S. § 28-8428 also is misplaced. That *398 statute exempts counties from liability for airport police officers’ acts or omissions unless the county is the airport’s governing body.”

Dbt Yuma LLC v. Yuma Cnty. Airport Auth. (Ariz. 2015). · cites it 6× “¶18 Finally, DBT Yuma’s reliance on A.R.S. § 28-8428 also is misplaced. That statute exempts counties from liability for airport police officers’ acts or omissions unless the county is the airport’s governing body.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-8428(B) — 2 cases

DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma Cnty. Airport Auth., 361 P.3d 379 (Ariz. 2015). “¶ 18 Finally, DBT Yuma’s reliance on A.R.S. § 28-8428 also is misplaced. That *398 statute exempts counties from liability for airport police officers’ acts or omissions unless the county is the airport’s governing body.”

Dbt Yuma LLC v. Yuma Cnty. Airport Auth. (Ariz. 2015). “¶18 Finally, DBT Yuma’s reliance on A.R.S. § 28-8428 also is misplaced. That statute exempts counties from liability for airport police officers’ acts or omissions unless the county is the airport’s governing body.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.