A. A department of agriculture administrative support fund is established. All monies collected pursuant to any interagency agreement with the department pursuant to section 3-588, subsection A shall be deposited, pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147, in the fund.
B. All monies collected pursuant to any interagency agreement with the department in accordance with section 3-468.03, subsection A and section 3-526.03, subsection A shall be deposited in the administrative support fund or deposited in the citrus, fruit and vegetable trust fund established by section 3-447 pursuant to the terms of the interagency agreement. Deposits in the administrative support fund shall be made pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147.
C. Monies in the fund are continuously appropriated and exempt from the provisions of section 35-190 relating to lapsing of appropriations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2021 · leading case:
Ader v. Est. of Felger, 375 P.3d 97 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
Ader v. Est. of Felger, 375 P.3d 97 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
“Code § 3-108, after which § 14-3108 was modeled, indicates that probate proceedings “must be commenced” within the “ultimate time limit” or “no administration could be opened.”
Est. of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc., 128 P.3d 234 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 4× “5 *121 ¶ 18 In In re Estate of Baca, the court examined the limitations placed on a late-appointed personal representative by New Mexico Statutes 1978 section 45-3-108(A)(4) (1995), which also parallels UPC § 3-108. In re Estate of Baca, 127 N.M. 535 , 984 P.”
Matter of Est. of Wood, 710 P.2d 476 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985).
“In holding that the limitation was not affected by equitable estoppel, the Montana Supreme Court stated: The statute is taken directly from the Uniform Probate Code, Section 3-108. It establishes a basic limitation of three years for determination of whether a decedent left a…”
Hunt v. Wood, 710 P.2d 476 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985).
“In holding that the limitation was not affected by equitable estoppel, the Montana Supreme Court stated: The statute is taken directly from the Uniform Probate Code, Section 3-108. It establishes a basic limitation of three years for determination of whether a decedent left a…”
Lampe v. Lampe (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021).
“”) § 3-108 (2019). Citing those provisions, Plaintiffs argue that the appropriate limitations period should be three years.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.