Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-129 (2026)

Confidentiality

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Examination material, file records of examination grading and performance, transcripts of educational institutions, letters of inquiry and reference concerning applicants and board inquiry forms concerning applicants are confidential and are not subject to inspection pursuant to title 39, chapter 1, article 2.

B. Investigation files of any investigation are confidential and are not subject to inspection pursuant to title 39, chapter 1, article 2 until the matter is final, a hearing notice is issued pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10 or the matter is settled by consent order. However, the registrant shall be informed of and have access to the complaint and investigative assessments and the public may obtain information that an investigation is being conducted and of its general nature.

C. Informal conferences held by advisory committees are confidential and are not open to the public. All information, including any minutes or reports created or obtained pursuant to an informal conference, is confidential until the matter is final, a hearing notice is issued pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10 or the matter is settled by consent order. The board may discuss matters that are being reviewed by an advisory committee in open session but may not introduce confidential documents into public board records.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1991–1991 · leading case: Arizona Bd. of Regents v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 806 P.2d 348 (Ariz. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Arizona Bd. of Regents v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 806 P.2d 348 (Ariz. 1991). · cites it 4× “§ 31-221(C); and architects' application transcripts, letters of inquiry, references, and investigation files of any pending investigation are "confidential and not public records," A.R.S. § 32-129. Additionally, the Arizona Legislature has permitted, in some situations, what…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.