Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-2159 (2026)

Judicial review; costs; transcript

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Except as provided in section 41-1092.08, subsection H, a final decision of the commissioner may be appealed to the superior court in Maricopa county pursuant to title 12, chapter 7, article 6.

B. If the superior court declares an appealing party indigent, on appeal the department shall pay the costs of the reporter's transcript of proceedings and shall produce a certified copy of all documents and evidence in the administrative record at no charge.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1971–2006 · leading case: Curtis v. Richardson, 131 P.3d 480 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Curtis v. Richardson, 131 P.3d 480 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “§ 32-2158(A) (2002) (right to witnesses); A.R.S. § 32-2159(A) (2002) (commissioner’s decision may be appealed to superior court).”
Bentivegna v. Powers Steel & Wire Prods., Inc., 81 P.3d 1040 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “In support of this proposition, Powers cites A.R.S. § 32-2159(A), the statute governing appeals from decisions of the real estate commissioner, as well as A.”
Didlo v. Talley, 520 P.2d 540 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 3× “Conversely, A.R.S. § 32-2153 and §§ 32-2157 through 32-2159 are special statutes relating to hearings before the Real Estate Commissioner.”
Meyer v. Campbell, 480 P.2d 22 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 2× “For example, in the following situations the administrative determination as to a license is limited to judicial review in superior court: A.R.S. § 32-2159, as amended (Real Estate Brokers and Salesmen) ; § 32-1756 (Optometrists); § 32-2391 (Driver Training Instructors or…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-2159(A) — 2 cases
Curtis v. Richardson, 131 P.3d 480 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006). “§ 32-2158(A) (2002) (right to witnesses); A.R.S. § 32-2159(A) (2002) (commissioner’s decision may be appealed to superior court).”
Bentivegna v. Powers Steel & Wire Prods., Inc., 81 P.3d 1040 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004). “In support of this proposition, Powers cites A.R.S. § 32-2159(A), the statute governing appeals from decisions of the real estate commissioner, as well as A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.