A. A judgment of a justice or municipal court may be prepared for recording using either of the following procedures:
1. The clerk of the superior court, on presentation of a certified transcript of a judgment for more than fifteen dollars, exclusive of costs, given by a justice or municipal court, shall forthwith file the judgment. From the time of filing the transcript of the judgment, that judgment shall be deemed the judgment of the superior court, shall be in the control of the superior court and shall be carried into execution in the same manner and with like effect as a judgment of the superior court.
2. The clerk of a justice court or municipal court shall issue a certified copy of any judgment of that court on request and payment of the fee prescribed by law. On issuance of the certified copy of the justice court or municipal court judgment, the certified copy of the judgment may be recorded and may be executed in the same manner and with like effect as a judgment of the superior court.
B. Any judgment must be recorded in the manner provided in section 33-961 before it becomes a lien on or in any manner affects or encumbers the real property of the judgment debtor or any part of the real property of the judgment debtor.
Notes of Decisions
Ironwood Commons Cmty. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Randall, 439 P.3d 1193 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 14× “No language in this or related statutes prohibited Ironwood from following the procedures in § 33-962(A) to docket the justice court judgment in the Maricopa County Superior Court and from then renewing that judgment, as contemplated by § 12-1612.”
Cecilia M Lewis Et Vir v. Ray C Debord Et Ux, 356 P.3d 314 (Ariz. 2015).
· cites it 2× “” 3 (Emphasis added.) Because the legislature did not include similar language in reference to judgment liens based on Arizona state court judgments, we assume that this omission was purposeful.”
JC Penney v. Lane, 3 P.3d 1033 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 33-962(A). ¶ 24 The judgment Penney obtained against the Lanes in the justice court in Page, Arizona, was rightly filed with the Clerk of the Coconino County Superior Court where it was entered in the appropriate records and became a judgment of the Coconino County…”
Palisades v. Roberto (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 33-962(A). Once a transcript judgment has been entered and docketed in superior court, it may be renewed by filing an affidavit for renewal with the clerk of the superior court.”
Marquez v. Perez, 484 P.2d 220 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971).
· cites it 4× “2, Pima County, Arizona, and subsequently filed transcripts thereof as provided in A.R.S. § 33-962. Several months later, the appellant filed a *452 motion in superior court to vacate these judgments on the ground of excusable neglect.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-962(A) — 3 cases
Ironwood Commons Cmty. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Randall, 439 P.3d 1193 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
“No language in this or related statutes prohibited Ironwood from following the procedures in § 33-962(A) to docket the justice court judgment in the Maricopa County Superior Court and from then renewing that judgment, as contemplated by § 12-1612.”
JC Penney v. Lane, 3 P.3d 1033 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“A.R.S. § 33-962(A). ¶ 24 The judgment Penney obtained against the Lanes in the justice court in Page, Arizona, was rightly filed with the Clerk of the Coconino County Superior Court where it was entered in the appropriate records and became a judgment of the Coconino County…”
Palisades v. Roberto (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
“A.R.S. § 33-962(A). Once a transcript judgment has been entered and docketed in superior court, it may be renewed by filing an affidavit for renewal with the clerk of the superior court.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-962(A)(1) — 1 case
Ironwood Commons Cmty. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Randall, 439 P.3d 1193 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
“No language in this or related statutes prohibited Ironwood from following the procedures in § 33-962(A) to docket the justice court judgment in the Maricopa County Superior Court and from then renewing that judgment, as contemplated by § 12-1612.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-962(B) — 1 case
Cecilia M Lewis Et Vir v. Ray C Debord Et Ux, 356 P.3d 314 (Ariz. 2015).
“” 3 (Emphasis added.) Because the legislature did not include similar language in reference to judgment liens based on Arizona state court judgments, we assume that this omission was purposeful.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.