Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2812 (2026)
Marijuana research; grants; posting
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
36-2812. Marijuana research; grants; posting
(Added with a 1998 Prop. 105 clause pursuant to L21, Ch. 398)
A. The department shall provide grants from monies in the medical marijuana fund established by section 36-2817 for research on the correlation between marijuana use and mental illness, including psychosis, and violent behavior.
B. The department shall post on its public website all research conducted pursuant to the grants provided under this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2015–2017 · leading case: State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “Notably, the AMMA contained an interim provision, A.R.S. § 36-2812, that created an “[a]ffirmative defense” for marijuana charges.”
State of Arizona v. Liwski, 358 P.3d 605 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “Indeed, the only proposed interpretation that reasonably could be characterized as absurd is the one proposed by Gillie — that a cultivator could possess marijuana far in excess of the allowable limit if he or she is able to conjure a sufficient list of eligible recipients.”
State v. Wyatt (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “This provision was formerly codified in A.R.S. § 36-2812 (2010). ¶9 The affirmative defense in A.”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “Notably, the AMMA contained an interim provision, A.R.S. § 36-2812, that created an “[a]ffirmative defense” for marijuana charges.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.