36-2814. Acts not required; acts not prohibited
(Caution: 1998 Prop. 105 applies)
A. Nothing in this chapter requires:
1. A government medical assistance program, a private health insurer or a workers' compensation carrier or self-insured employer providing workers' compensation benefits to reimburse a person for costs associated with the medical use of marijuana.
2. Any person or establishment in lawful possession of property to allow a guest, client, customer or other visitor to use marijuana on or in that property.
3. An employer to allow the ingestion of marijuana in any workplace or any employee to work while under the influence of marijuana, except that a registered qualifying patient shall not be considered to be under the influence of marijuana solely because of the presence of metabolites or components of marijuana that appear in insufficient concentration to cause impairment.
B. Nothing in this chapter prohibits an employer from disciplining an employee for ingesting marijuana in the workplace or working while under the influence of marijuana.
Notes of Decisions
Whitmire v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 359 F. Supp. 3d 761 (D. Ariz. 2019).
· cites it 8× “§ 36-2814(A)(3)-(B). However, "a registered qualifying patient shall not be considered to be under the influence of marijuana solely because of the presence of metabolites or components of marijuana that appear in insufficient concentration to cause impairment.”
State v. Maestas, 394 P.3d 21 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 4× “” A.R.S. §§ 36-2814(A)(2) (describing acts not required), -2801(9) (defining “medical use” to include possession), The Legislature is therefore free to bar the use and possession of marijuana on public college and university campuses to protect federal funding—or for any other…”
Terry v. UPS (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 8× “” A.R.S. § 36-2814(A)(3) (emphasis added). But “[n]othing in” the AMMA “requires .”
Wright's Case (Mass. 2020).
“040 (c) ("A governmental, private, or other health insurance provider is not liable for any claim for reimbursement for expenses associated with medical use of marijuana"); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2814 ("Nothing in this chapter requires .”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2814(A)(2) — 1 case
State v. Maestas, 394 P.3d 21 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“” A.R.S. §§ 36-2814(A)(2) (describing acts not required), -2801(9) (defining “medical use” to include possession), The Legislature is therefore free to bar the use and possession of marijuana on public college and university campuses to protect federal funding—or for any other…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2814(A)(3) — 2 cases
Whitmire v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 359 F. Supp. 3d 761 (D. Ariz. 2019).
“§ 36-2814(A)(3)-(B). However, "a registered qualifying patient shall not be considered to be under the influence of marijuana solely because of the presence of metabolites or components of marijuana that appear in insufficient concentration to cause impairment.”
Terry v. UPS (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“” A.R.S. § 36-2814(A)(3) (emphasis added). But “[n]othing in” the AMMA “requires .”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2814(B) — 2 cases
Whitmire v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 359 F. Supp. 3d 761 (D. Ariz. 2019).
“§ 36-2814(A)(3)-(B). However, "a registered qualifying patient shall not be considered to be under the influence of marijuana solely because of the presence of metabolites or components of marijuana that appear in insufficient concentration to cause impairment.”
Terry v. UPS (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“” A.R.S. § 36-2814(A)(3) (emphasis added). But “[n]othing in” the AMMA “requires .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.