A. Subject to the right to refuse psychiatric and medical treatment pursuant to sections 36-512 and 36-513 and pursuant to rules of the administration, every person undergoing evaluation or treatment pursuant to this chapter shall receive physical and psychiatric care and treatment, delivered in a manner that allows the person's family members or guardian to participate in the care and treatment when appropriate, for the full period the person is detained. The agency providing care and treatment shall keep a clinical record for each person that details all medical and psychiatric evaluations and all care and treatment received by the person.
B. An agency administering the care and treatment shall provide and make available to the guardian, if one exists, on request:
1. A written treatment program based on the individual needs of the person.
2. Careful and periodic reexaminations of each person by appropriate professional persons, including a physician. Reexaminations shall be made once each ninety days, and the results shall be a part of the person's medical record.
3. A full physical examination once a year.
4. Adequate medical treatment in the light of present medical knowledge in accordance with the results of these examinations.
C. An agency administering inpatient care and treatment, in conjunction with the community treatment agency and before the release of a patient, shall prepare a plan for the patient's care after release, including arrangements for a place to live and an adequate program for necessary treatment and maintenance, and shall provide the plan to the patient's guardian if one exists. The community treatment agency shall make a good faith effort to initiate treatment with a patient released from an inpatient facility.
Notes of Decisions
Large v. Superior Court, 714 P.2d 399 (Ariz. 1986).
· cites it 10× “He argues, rather, that in the absence of procedural restrictions on involuntary pharmacological restraints such as those imposed on the state with respect to civilly committed mental patients by Title 36 (A.R.S. §§ 36-511 to 36-513), DOC's actions violate due process.”
Arnold v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 775 P.2d 521 (Ariz. 1989).
· cites it 4× “The trial court further concluded that ASH has a mandatory non-discretionary duty under A.R.S. §§ 36-511(C) and 36-204 to the plaintiff class.”
Anderson v. State, 663 P.2d 570 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982).
· cites it 13× “Subject to his right to refuse psychiatric and medical treatment pursuant to §§ 36-512 and 36-513 and pursuant to regulations of the department every person undergoing evaluation or treatment pursuant to this chapter shall receive physical and psychiatric care and treatment for…”
In Re Pinal Cnty. Mental Health No. Mh-201000029, 240 P.3d 1262 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 4× “" [14] Given the parties' failure to support their arguments with any evidentiary material, this is an exercise in which I will not, and respectfully suggest my colleagues should not, engage.”
Boies v. Cole, 407 P.2d 917 (Ariz. 1965).
· cites it 4× “§ 36-504, now § 36-511, and delivered to the sheriff's office.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-511(A) — 1 case
Anderson v. State, 663 P.2d 570 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982).
“Subject to his right to refuse psychiatric and medical treatment pursuant to §§ 36-512 and 36-513 and pursuant to regulations of the department every person undergoing evaluation or treatment pursuant to this chapter shall receive physical and psychiatric care and treatment for…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-511(C) — 1 case
Arnold v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 775 P.2d 521 (Ariz. 1989).
“The trial court further concluded that ASH has a mandatory non-discretionary duty under A.R.S. §§ 36-511(C) and 36-204 to the plaintiff class.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.