Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-321 (2026)

Judgment

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the accused is convicted, the court of impeachment shall, at such time as it appoints, pronounce judgment by resolution entered upon the journals of the court, which shall be the judgment of the senate. The judgment of conviction may provide that the accused be removed from office or that he be removed from office and disqualified to hold any office of honor, trust or profit under the constitution and laws of the state.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1988–1990 · leading case: Mecham v. Gordon, 751 P.2d 957 (Ariz. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Mecham v. Gordon, 751 P.2d 957 (Ariz. 1988). · cites it 2× “2, § 2; see also A.R.S. § 38-321. Impeachment is permitted for “high crimes, misdemeanors, or malfeasance in office.”

Ingram v. Shumway, 794 P.2d 147 (Ariz. 1990). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 38-321. While again far from definitive, the passage of the statute certainly provides some evidence that the constitutional provision may be read, and was read, as allowing the legislative body discretion over the issue of future disqualification.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.