Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 38
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-506 (2026)

Remedies

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. In addition to any other remedies provided by law, any contract entered into by a public agency in violation of this article is voidable at the instance of the public agency.

B. Any person affected by a decision of a public agency may commence a civil suit in the superior court for the purpose of enforcing the civil provisions of this article. The court may order such equitable relief as it deems appropriate in the circumstances including the remedies provided in this section.

C. The court may in its discretion order payment of costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, to the prevailing party in an action brought under subsection B.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2021 · leading case: Maucher v. City of Eloy, 701 P.2d 593 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Maucher v. City of Eloy, 701 P.2d 593 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “services, unless pursuant to an award or contract let after public competitive bidding____” Recourse available for violation of the conflict of interest statute is set forth in A.R.S. § 38-506 as follows: “A.R.S. § 38-506.”
David Welch v. Cochise Bd. of Supervisors (Ariz. 2021). · cites it 3× “Though the scope of suitable claimants under each depends upon a distinct event—for the open-meeting law, its violation; for the conflict-of-interest law, a decision—we, like the court of appeals, see “no principled reason” to adopt dissimilar meanings for their common…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-506(B) — 1 case
David Welch v. Cochise Bd. of Supervisors (Ariz. 2021). “Though the scope of suitable claimants under each depends upon a distinct event—for the open-meeting law, its violation; for the conflict-of-interest law, a decision—we, like the court of appeals, see “no principled reason” to adopt dissimilar meanings for their common…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.