Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 4
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 4-211 (2026)

Judicial review; bond

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Except as provided in section 41-1092.08, subsection H, final decisions of the board are subject to judicial review pursuant to title 12, chapter 7, article 6.

B. In the case of any judicial review of a decision of the department, the director may require the posting of a bond with the court to reimburse the department for reasonable costs in transcribing and preparing the record of the department.  The bond is payable to the department if the court awards costs to the department pursuant to section 12-912.  

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1964–2022 · leading case: Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor Bd., 807 P.2d 1136 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor Bd., 807 P.2d 1136 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. §§ 4-211, 12-901 —914. Following the filing of the administrative record, the applicant filed a motion for judgment on a number of grounds, including the ground that because the tie vote of the Board did not constitute official action, the Superintendent’s decision was…”
Nunnally v. Moore, 570 P.2d 195 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 4× “Nunnally appealed the revocation to Superior Court pursuant to the authority of A.R.S. § 4-211. Thereafter Mondhink and then Reiss and Bookbinder moved and were granted permission to intervene.”
Arden-mayfair, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Liq. Lic. & C., 599 P.2d 793 (Ariz. 1979). · cites it 2× “Arden-Mayfair then filed an appeal in the superior court pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-211. Farmers moved to intervene in the appeal and its motion was granted over Arden-Mayfair’s objection.”
Arizona State Liquor Bd. v. Jacobs, 511 P.2d 179 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 5× “In its judgment reversing the State Liquor Board, the trial court stated: “ . . . The Court finds by overwhelming evidence that the public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be substantially served by the transfer of said license.”
Robertson v. Superior Ct. State of Ariz., 666 P.2d 540 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 4-211 provides that decisions of the board shall be subject to judicial review pursuant to the act.”
Plowman v. Arizona State Liquor Bd., 732 P.2d 222 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “The decision of the panel was appealed to the superior court pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 4-211 and 12-901. After a hearing and review of the administrative record, the court entered a judgment which: 1) reversed all of the panel’s findings on the 20 counts, 2) found that the penalty…”
Garcia v. Arizona State Liquor Bd., 520 P.2d 852 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 4-211, subsee. A. Second, that under A.”
Mathis v. Liquor Bd., 707 P.2d 974 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 4-211 and A.R.S. §§ 12-901 — 12-914, the Administrative Review Act.”
Hiett v. Howard, 494 P.2d 1347 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 4-211, subsec. A reads as follows : “A.”
Hooper v. Duncan, 389 P.2d 706 (Ariz. 1964). “” § 4-211, subd. A. “Upon the reversion of a license as provided in § 4-203, subsection E, the superintendent shall issue to the lessee from whom the license reverted a license of the same class as that which reverted, provided such lessee makes application within six months…”
Black v. Siler, 392 P.2d 572 (Ariz. 1964). “” § 4-211, subd. A. “Upon the reversion of a license as provided in § 4-203, subsection E, the superintendent shall issue to the lessee from whom the license reverted a license of the same class as that which reverted, provided such lessee makes application within six months…”
Lugo v. Moore, 462 P.2d 102 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 2× “” On timely appeal to this Court we have reviewed the record using as our guidelines the guidelines given to the Superior Court by A.R.S. § 4-211, subsec. C heretofore quoted.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 4-211(A) — 1 case
Gabaldon v. Maricopa, Cnty. of (D. Ariz. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.