Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1004 (2026)
Waiver
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Except to the extent precluded by another provision of law, a person may waive any right conferred on that person by this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases, 1959–1999 · leading case: Marcus T. Baumann v. Arizona Dep't of Corr., 754 F.2d 841 (9th Cir. 1985).
Marcus T. Baumann v. Arizona Dep't of Corr., 754 F.2d 841 (9th Cir. 1985). “Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 41-1004. However, the state cannot arbitrarily deny privileges based on the lack of regulations if it grants privileges under unfiled regulations to other prisoners.”
Brown v. State, 573 P.2d 876 (Ariz. 1978). “* The Department argues that it has not made the required filing (A.R.S. § 41-1004) of regulations with the Secretary of State, so there can be no effective regulations allowing good time credits under which petitioner could qualify.”
Morris v. Arizona Corp. Comm'n, 539 P.2d 928 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). “Section B of A.R.S. § 41-1004 (set forth in Footnote No.”
Thomas v. Ariz. State Bd. of Pardons & Paroles, 564 P.2d 79 (Ariz. 1977). “2d 779 (1962), this court held that the parole board was required by statute, A.R.S. § 41-1004, to file its rules and regulations with the Secretary of State.”
Baker v. Leight, 370 P.2d 268 (Ariz. 1962). “A.R.S. § 41-1004 makes the Office of the Secretary of State the repository for Rules and Regulations adopted by the various administrative agencies of the state.”
McGee v. Arizona State Bd. of Pardons & Paroles, 376 P.2d 779 (Ariz. 1962). “By A.R.S. § 41-1004 the rules and regulations of state agencies must be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State.”
Stewart v. Arizona Bd. of Pardons & Paroles, 753 P.2d 1194 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “A.R.S. § 41-1004; Thomas v. Arizona Board of Pardons and Paroles, 115 Ariz.”
State v. Wacker, 344 P.2d 1004 (Ariz. 1959). “” By A.R.S. § 41-1004, every rule adopted by an agency shall be certified and filed with the office of the Secretary of State, or it shall be of no force or effect.”
Sulger v. Arizona Corp. Comm'n, 423 P.2d 145 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967). “We do not find the statute unconstitutionally vague, for pursuant to its constitutional power the Commission has enacted a number of rules which have been filed with the Secretary of State under A.R.S. § 41-1004. These General Orders define what subjects are included in “good…”
Cagle Bros. Trucking Serv. v. Arizona Corp. Comm'n, 394 P.2d 203 (Ariz. 1964). “This the Commission may require but not without adopting a written rule or regulation in compliance with the Arizona Administrative Procedure Act, A.R.S. § 41-1004, which it has not done. Lacking a formally adopted rule, information concerning the inadequacy of the present…”
Oliver v. State Land Dep't, 692 P.2d 305 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). “The process employed here to “correct” the regulation is in no way consistent with the statutory requirements for amending a regulation.”
Arizona State Bd. of Regents Ex Rel. Arizona State Univ. v. Arizona State Pers. Bd., 985 P.2d 1032 (Ariz. 1999). “§ 41-1002(0), § 41-1004, and § 41-1029(0). ¶ 12 On the other hand, the words “provided by law” are used in § 41-1062 to expressly exclude agency rules.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1004(A) — 3 cases
Mills v. Indus. Comm'n, 530 P.2d 385 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975).
Williams v. Tucson Unified Sch. Dist. No. 1, 760 P.2d 1081 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
Mendoza v. Indus. Comm'n, 528 P.2d 184 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1974).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1004(B) — 1 case
Arizona Dep't of AeroNautics v. Fred Harvey Transp. Co., 561 P.2d 322 (Ariz. 1977).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.