A. The secretary of state shall prepare and publish the code and register.
B. The secretary of state shall prescribe a uniform numbering system and have reasonable discretion to determine the form and style for rules filed with and published by the office. The secretary of state shall refuse to accept a rule notice or other notice filing if the notice or filing does not comply with the secretary of state's prescribed filing requirements, numbering system, form and style.
C. The secretary of state shall assign titles and chapters to agencies and prepare, arrange and correlate rules and other text as necessary when publishing the code and register. The secretary of state may not alter the sense, meaning or effect of any rule but may renumber rules and parts of rules, rearrange rules, change reference numbers to agree with renumbered rules and parts of rules, substitute the proper rule number for "the preceding rule" and similar terms, delete figures if they are merely a repetition of written words, change capitalization for the purpose of uniformity and correct manifest clerical or typographical errors. With the consent of the attorney general, the secretary of state may remove from the code a provision of a rule that a court of final appeal declares unconstitutional or otherwise invalid and a rule made by an agency that is abolished if the rule is not transferred to a successor agency. The secretary of state shall remove a rule from the code when notified by the governor's regulatory review council that the rule has expired pursuant to section 41-1056, subsection J.
Notes of Decisions
Post v. Indus. Com'n of Arizona, 770 P.2d 308 (Ariz. 1989).
· cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 41-1011. The judge must separately state the findings and conclusions, and the findings “shall be accompanied by a concise and explicit statement of the underlying facts supporting the findings” (emphasis added).”
Arizona Dep't of Revenue v. Care Comput. Sys., Inc., 4 P.3d 469 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
· cites it 4× “Our Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") not only requires the publication of existing agency rules and regulations, see A.R.S. §§ 41-1011, -1012, but also the publication of a monthly register concerning "proposed repeals, makings or amendments of rules.”
Arden-mayfair, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Liq. Lic. & C., 599 P.2d 793 (Ariz. 1979).
· cites it 4× “a proper party to the appeal in the superior court and this court? (3) Was the decision of the state liquor board arbitrary and capricious? Arden-Mayfair argues that the order did not contain findings of fact as required by A.R.S. § 41-1011, and was therefore materially affected…”
Arizona State Tax Comm'n v. Phelps Dodge Corp., 568 P.2d 1073 (Ariz. 1977).
· cites it 2× “The Superior Court entered summary judgments on appellees’ motions for the reason that the decisions of the Tax Commission were void for failure of the Commission to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by A.R.S. § 41-1011 of the Administrative Procedure Act.”
Tabora v. State, 722 P.2d 989 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986).
· cites it 2× “Tabora does not argue that A.R.S. § 41-1011, which requires a concise and explicit statement of the underlying facts supporting the findings, applied to the informal interview procedure.”
Legacy Educ. v. Asbcs (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 2× “2, “Publication of Agency Rules,” A.R.S. §§ 41-1011 to -1014; Art. 3, “Rule Making,” A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.