Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1601 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Department" means the state department of corrections.

2. "Director" means the director of the state department of corrections.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1968–2009 · leading case: Santa Cruz v. State Deparment of Corr., 446 P.2d 253 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Santa Cruz v. State Deparment of Corr., 446 P.2d 253 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 5× “The authority of the State Department of Corrections has not been enlarged by the enactment of A.R.S. §§ 41-1601 to 41-1609. In A.R.S. § 41-1601, subsec.”

Rose v. Arizona Dep't of Corr., 804 P.2d 845 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. §§ 41-1601 through -1675; see also A.”

BILKE v. State, 209 P.3d 1056 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “01 with a private person, firm, corporation or association the director shall prescribe prisoner compensation of at least two dollars per hour.”

Stanhope v. State, 825 P.2d 25 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. §§ 41-1601 through 41-1675. Thus, judicial review is available only if it is authorized by the ARA.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1601(2) — 1 case

BILKE v. State, 209 P.3d 1056 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). “01 with a private person, firm, corporation or association the director shall prescribe prisoner compensation of at least two dollars per hour.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.